And I don't know why you play the piano? If it's supposed to be for enjoyment, lower your goals a bit, be kind to yourself!
Please, don't tell me it's talent. That's not the only factor. Might be his training. I can't do anything right now about my training. Practice, practice, practice? I practice as I can, until either my fingers or brain or heart gets tired.
Sometimes I feel guilty that maybe I'm too lazy, lack perseverance and all... Is that it?
It's not that I want to play fast, virtuosic pieces, concertos, or even the most popular pieces. I don't want to be a concert artist
I actually think that one of the factors compromising you is pushing so much effort in learning. When your fingers, your brain and your heart get tired you learn nothing, just stress yourself and your planing apparatus. We all have a limit, a limit of data to memorize or information to understand of physical patterns to automatize. If you're always exceeding those limits you're not only preventing the learning of new things but unlearning the old things as well.
No, it's probably the opposite. I will keep using the weight loss analogy. The key is eating less of healthy foods.You're probably eating too much of unhealthy food.The idea that more is always better is a nonsense.
I think the point is that to being a talented players of virtuosic pieces and concertos you need the amount of dedication and hard work typical of someone who is planning to become a concertist. That's why I have never met a total amateur whose only goal is to entertain friends with the family piano being able to play those pieces.
Er, no, am not pushing too hard if that's what you mean. I watch myself so I don't get that far. I've learned a bit from making that mistake and paying for it with a couple of days off the piano. That was the worst, I don't even want to remember.That's confusing. Maybe you mean MORE of healthy food, and less unhealthy??
So you think I'm aiming too low? Aim for the sun and hit the clouds; aim for the clouds and hit the ground, is that it? Don't get me wrong. I looooooove piano music. I play for the music, not just to "entertain friends with the family piano". And I want to teach. If my student says, "I want to play virtuosic pieces and concertos," I want to be able to help.
No, because if you eat a lot of healthy food they become automatically unhealthy.You must moderate the amount and point at the maximum quality possible.Just because a food is healthy "organic avocado" it doesn't mean you can eat as much as you want. So with food the secret is "minizing the amount of calories by maximizing the quality of every calorie"
I just think that certain hobbies become professions because the time and dedication required (often full time) doesn't make it possible to do otherwise. A professional writer, writing as a job, has enough daily time to dedicate to professional writing. If he were someone working in a factory 10 hours a day, he wouldn't likely have enough time to write to the level of a professional writer. It requires time, effort and educative updates and often extensive researches about the environment the novel is going to be set. Hobbists don't have a chance to go so far with their music unless they have a part time job or unless they dedicate all their time to music with the goal of making it a work.
You are not very likely to find students that will want to play virtuosic pieces and concertors. That kind of repertory comes after many years of beginning and intermediate piano lessons. Usually it is touched only by conservatories and music accademies. So if they're interested in that kind of repertory they're already thinking of pursuing an accademical career in music, and hence there will be accademy professors teaching them those things.
Nobody has put it that way to me before. I get it about moderating the amount, yes. Thanks.I understand maximizing each minute, but what do you mean, an overdose of quality time? If it's an overdose, I wouldn't call it quality time.
Hobby? You lost me there. Piano is no hobby.
Guess there's no need to worry about that...?Er, is 3 years considered many? Just thinking out loud here...
Considering that most piano students will be either kids or adults with time to spare, they can't all go to conservatories if they happen to want to play that repertory. Why limit them?
For many it is an hobby. For many music is an hobby.You can call activity if you want or even passion, but I still think that the 90% of those who think of piano as a passion try to stick with it either in college or in life. I'm not saying it is always possible but I have never heard of someone working 10 hours in a factory and playing advanced repertory with huge passion and musical sensitivity. If they exist they're very rare.
No 3 years is nothing....What you're talking about is the difference between the guys who are playing a basketball match behind my house and an NBA player.
I learned that from my teachers that it is possible to be a serious musician or serious "hobbyist" (though I obviously don't like the term) without doing it full-time. 10 hours in a factory is of course, extreme. I'm talking about part-time jobs and studying other courses. It is very possible. Some of our teachers expect us to get serious despite jobs, courses, etc. Very few, like me, are full-time music students.
If 3 years is nothing, the boy I talked about wouldn't exist! An "NBA player" in 3 years. And at his age, he can even opt to take a different path entirely while playing piano.
Teachers often have wrong or exaggerated expection that usually make them too demanding which is actually worse for many students, since often doing a lot means doing too much and doing nothing very good and a lot of things very bad....He is a rare case and there's no doubt or question about it.Not even the most talented would learn that much in 3 years....It takes far more than three years to reach the level you're talking about and the extraordinary cases you hear about are just that: extraordinary cases; not certainly models to imitate (that would only cause frustration and resentment) And that influence negative piano playing way more than not practicing for 6 months.
Okay. Am twice as much demoralized now. Reality is painful.
There's this boy who's 13 on youtube. He only started in 2005, and won the Bach competition in a year.
You're not doing your piano playing any favour.Focus on what you're doing right now.What are you studying? Are you satisfied with the rendition of your actual pieces?Are you satisfied with your technical control right now? Are you so confident of having mastery what you're practicing right now to ask your teacher to move on at once?What's the point of wondering about future pieces when you have so much to focus and learn in the present?...The future and our future successes are built on the present, the successes of the present makes us hopeful about the future. Failing to collect successes now because of an obsession with the future (something which doesn't exist at any level right now and it's just in our imagination) is not helpful to either your present or your future.
He's almost 13, I think. See for yourself.
Since the channel is designed by the father he might as well lie about the real age at which his son started playing the piano. (which is something parents do, believe me) Also he clearly had strong predisposition (and I have already touched on how certain non-piano experiences form the basis for pianistic predisposition) and has been enrolled in an extra university course. This is nothing like 60 minutes lessons a week. This is usually hours of lessons a day plus hours of practicing. I won't be surprised if he gave up friends, parties, outdoor activities and even some of the homeworks to practice (nothing bad about it! it's just that it shows my point about the need of extra time to remove from other activities) Now stop worrying about this person you don't even know and focus on yourself and your music.
Er, but we do know the father and the boy. This is true. I'm not worrying. Not right now. I was stressing a bit lately, sorry. Uni offers an extension course not much different from lessons outside, except perhaps the teachers are better, and it is cheap. I know that because I've considered it, but the university is a far commute from home. Am still considering it, after my 3-year integrated music course is done. Am happy. I don't regret this decision at all.
Well something must going on here.It is not a matter of being a genius or whatever it is a matter of time. ...
danny, you got me there. I give up...
You can be whatever you want and you can be a great teacher but your perseverance, persistance and tenacity is influenced by your interion strength, that very same strength that should never allow you to be discouraged by some youtube player you don't even know. Fight against such discourage and againt such mental masturbation because that's part of your talent and value as a musician: the control of your mind.
But I do know the boy, LOL!
On a serious note, you're right. I lack strength, physical and mental.
*I'm die*
saaad... so saaad.... I feel no progress after all.......
But do you really know me? I wonder what made you say I don't lack strength when I feel like I do.
We all have strength and lot of it but sometimes it's hidden.If I have lost something inside my house I don't lack it, I just have to find where it is.Love, strength, courage, determination (in my opinion) can't be lacked, only in need to be found inside ourselves because they're already there.