Oops...it's time for me to reply you guys~

Firstly, thanks for replying me in this topic. I started this topic because I think Gould's music is sometimes hateful but sometimes wonderful...I've listened to the Goldberg Variation played by him as well, it is 1982 recordings. I agreed that his performance of this piece is emotional, but don't you think it is awfully dry? Listen to his "famous" D minor concerto! I can hardly understand, it sounds extraordinary mechanically and dry to me! I could say that it is unbearable and quite meaningless. He is trying to return to tonal dryness which is no reason for pianist to do so nowadays after the important mechanical adjunct of the pianoforte. Nonetheless, his changes of tone quality and dynamic nuance are to be appreciated.
My previous piano teacher is a huge fan of Glenn Gould, he always use Glenn Gould as an exemplary performer of Bach, and I always have quite an argue with him. His argument supporting himself is that his Bach interpretation is always unparalleled with incredible technique. He also thinks that his performance involves enormous energy which is unique.
My current piano teacher somehow totally agree with me. He said that Glenn Gould is admittedly a child prodigy, but she also commented that his music is too dry and sounds technical sometimes. Well...What are your judgements? :-/