
yay for progress. I'm smiling at your tragedies because it's weird how I've been going through a similar thought process. As soon as I used to get wind of 'this method' or 'that method', I'd have such weirdly high expectations. It's like, "Finally, I can play whatever I want now." But then reality (usually the next practice session) hits and I would realize, "Nope, not there yet." <--in a much more dramatic, angsty fashion lol
Nowadays, this doesn't really happen with methods so much as me finding new thought process and then getting disappointed.
But the funny thing about a huge number of 'epic fail' practice days is that, the next method is always somehow better. Perhaps all the different methods that I've gone through are addressing completely different things that I'm not even aware of.
Ex. Maybe today's strategy of imagining the notes as unique points on a continuum made up of keys only addresses note location and interval recognition skills, but when I go to my lessons and the teacher expects a much more consistent, well articulated sound, or maybe, the next practice I'll find that it just doesn't work quite correctly, I'll to completely crash out of despair (veeery dramatic lol), regroup, and go at it again.
Proficiency = Thousands of hours at least ^^"
If you check my posts actually, you might see me giving different forms of advice here and there. They are almost unrelated, but successive. Does that make sense?
Anyway, here's where my head is at right now.
The general rule that I've picked up since I started lessons (yay university

) is that if you're not paying attention to sound, you are working on something unrelated to music. It maybe some sort of playing mechanism practice (learning how to use your hands appropriately). While this is important, it is never to be your absolute focus. A musician's absolute focus should be the sound he produces.
got that? ok.
Focus = sound.
sound = hammer hits string, finger holds down key, finger lets go and the damper (is that the right word?) kills the sound.
That's the only degree of active thinking I have allowed myself to do since this method took shape.
The difficulty is in drawing parallels to your hands, your body etc. All three parts to the sound require a parallel. You have to create that parallel. The more relaxed you are, the better. The less movement, the better. You achieve this by localizing all of your mental cues about these parallels to your fingers...but even then...there is the distinction between localizing and the finger school...
Ok, I'm gonna stop right there ^^" lol unless you guys ask for more. Do you see what I mean? Do you see the amount of things that need to be considered? The amount of variables? That's why you need failure, so that you can work on a concept that may not be central (such as what I mean by 'localizing' rather than finger school).
To conclude, here is what I tell myself when I go to the practice rooms.
"The goal is sound. The goal is the relaxed, well supported production of well articulated, well controlled sound."
This minimizes the act to the point where I have freedom to think about the music. I wonder what will develop out of the eventual failure of this method?
So, next time you get knocked over, please remember that it's a part of the process. No matter how well regarded a method is, it still takes a huge amount of time for the relaxed execution of that method. (I'm talking to myself too lol)
Good luck. Have fun failing
