Home
Piano Music
Piano Music Library
Audiovisual Study Tool
Search pieces
All composers
Top composers »
Bach
Beethoven
Brahms
Chopin
Debussy
Grieg
Haydn
Mendelssohn
Mozart
Liszt
Prokofiev
Rachmaninoff
Ravel
Schubert
Schumann
Scriabin
All composers »
All pieces
Recommended Pieces
PS Editions
Instructive Editions
Recordings
Recent additions
Free piano sheet music
News & Articles
PS Magazine
News flash
New albums
Livestreams
Article index
Piano Forum
Resources
Music dictionary
E-books
Manuscripts
Links
Mobile
About
About PS
Help & FAQ
Contact
Forum rules
Pricing
Log in
Sign up
Piano Forum
Home
Help
Search
Piano Forum
»
Piano Board
»
Repertoire
»
Debussy - l'isle joyeuse
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Topic: Debussy - l'isle joyeuse
(Read 12342 times)
pianisten1989
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 1515
Debussy - l'isle joyeuse
on: November 02, 2008, 10:34:57 AM
Well... my teacher suggested I should "l'isle joyeuse". I'll have untill March to play it, then I have to being able to play it very well.
Now, the subject:
Which are the technical problems in this piece?
And, since I'm not too familiar with music of Debussy, is there any pianist I'd listen to more than others? (Like Rubenstein to Chopin, or Cziffra to Liszt)
And last thing (And the most stupid question): How hard is this piece compared to The Waldstein sonata and the Mephistowaltz?
I know you really can't comare such different pieces, but generally, does the l'isle joyeuse cause a lot more problem than the Liszt piece?
Logged
Debussy: L'isle joyeuse in A Major
Sign up for a Piano Street membership to download this piano score.
Sign up for FREE! >>
pianistimo
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 12142
Re: Debussy - l'isle joyeuse
Reply #1 on: November 02, 2008, 12:56:27 PM
For me, personally, the 'Isle of Joy' is much much more difficult than the "Waldstein." And, yet - there are some comparisons in the freedom of movement and expression in the middle of the waldstein and throughout the isle of joy.
The first difficulty I had with the L'Isle was counting out the beats - so finally in the first measures I put in lines slashing through treble/bass that counted out '1-2-3e&a4e&a' The first group of thirty-second note/s would come on beat 3. The second on '&,' the third on 4, the fourth on '&' again. You can subdivide from there every other thirty-second to be 'e' or 'a' in the pattern 1 e & a ...
Then, you just throw it all up in the air after so much practice with the timing and play 'Quasi una cadenza.' For some reason, I kept wanting to maintain precision. This is my classical side coming out. I don't want to make a mistake with timing. Therefore, i am worried about these little notes and can't relax fully. I think for a while - i hated Debussy (not personally, just what he wrote).
Debussy also requires you to think 'out of the box' in MANY areas. Beethoven stays pretty close to the natural limits of pianists in the waldstein - but Debussy kind of says ' imagine yourself as an alien.' He can change beats and rhythms suddenly and this rapid change makes you have to always be thinking ahead since there are many notes per measure/page.
Beethoven did make some unusual key modulations and changes in the Waldstein - and so does Debussy. Look at around measure 114 at the key change from three sharps to C major - but plays all B's to start with the idea that he is actually in limbo here - musically speaking and adds in a C# soon to make things even more confusing. As i see it - the only thing connecting him and Beethoven is the use of the V chord and trilling because even Beethoven is somewhat more sensical about his diversions. Debussy is this way throughout. The instability is made to feel stable. In Beethoven you always know when youare going through a period of instability. But, of course, one could argue that even the beginning of the Waldstien is very unstable and unpredictable.
PS the trills I'll leave for someone else to talk about. I easily played the waldstein trills but somehow had more trouble with the ones in Debussy. Perhaps because there seems to be more of them - and you really have to have a lot of strength in you hands and not overdo it and kill your hand when playing the trill with a third. It's an unnatural position imo. When you have a simple trill - such as at the beginning - your thumb doesn't play into it at all. As soon as you lift your thumb to play the third below - it slightly changes the position of the hand.
Logged
pianistimo
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 12142
Re: Debussy - l'isle joyeuse
Reply #2 on: November 02, 2008, 01:10:47 PM
Do you think it's best to follow debussy's suggestion and 'do what you like...' in terms of fingering and just consider that pedalling will take care of the rest? I did a sort of thumb crossing with the beginning measure taking lh thumb on c-natural, b-flat, and a-flat (last of each grouping of thirty-seconds) and rh with everything else. It seemed to keep my hands relaxed.
Logged
pianisten1989
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 1515
Re: Debussy - l'isle joyeuse
Reply #3 on: November 02, 2008, 08:58:37 PM
Ok... Thx
I'll keep up the Brahms, finish my bach-piece, then begin with the debussy =)
Logged
pianisten1989
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 1515
Re: Debussy - l'isle joyeuse
Reply #4 on: November 05, 2008, 02:35:03 PM
One more thing:
What edition is the best one for Debussy?
Logged
cherub_rocker1979
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 646
Re: Debussy - l'isle joyeuse
Reply #5 on: November 06, 2008, 02:41:57 AM
Here's a great performance by Alexander Braginsky, who is on the faculty at the University of Minnesota.
Logged
Sign-up to post reply
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
For more information about this topic, click search below!
Search on Piano Street