Home
Piano Music
Piano Music Library
Top composers »
Bach
Beethoven
Brahms
Chopin
Debussy
Grieg
Haydn
Mendelssohn
Mozart
Liszt
Prokofiev
Rachmaninoff
Ravel
Schubert
Schumann
Scriabin
All composers »
All composers
All pieces
Search pieces
Recommended Pieces
Audiovisual Study Tool
Instructive Editions
Recordings
PS Editions
Recent additions
Free piano sheet music
News & Articles
PS Magazine
News flash
New albums
Livestreams
Article index
Piano Forum
Resources
Music dictionary
E-books
Manuscripts
Links
Mobile
About
About PS
Help & FAQ
Contact
Forum rules
Pricing
Log in
Sign up
Piano Forum
Home
Help
Search
Piano Forum
»
Piano Board
»
Student's Corner
»
Two questions on Chopin Op 28 No 4 in e minor
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Topic: Two questions on Chopin Op 28 No 4 in e minor
(Read 7701 times)
b0mbtrack
PS Silver Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 81
Two questions on Chopin Op 28 No 4 in e minor
on: February 26, 2009, 11:37:49 PM
These are probably two really dumb questions but oh well. I'm doing pretty good reading and playing this one at the same time which is a real accomplishment for me but I just have two questions on it.
1) In measure 13 there is that triplet starting on D. Is the 4th beat on that D or is it mixed in there between the D and the C?
2) Why is the time signature is cut in half? Does that mean there are only two beats per measure and everything is 16th notes? That sounds like it would be really fast, but I don't play it like that.
Logged
why does it hurt when i pee
Chopin: Prelude Op. 28 No. 4 in E Minor
Sign up for a Piano Street membership to download this piano score.
Sign up for FREE! >>
quantum
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 6260
Re: Two questions on Chopin Op 28 No 4 in e minor
Reply #1 on: February 27, 2009, 03:47:03 AM
1) 4th beat starts on D. It contains the triplet D-C-B.
2) The tempo indication "Largo" defines the speed of the piece. Just because it is cut time doesn't mean it has to be played fast. The indication of cut time probably alludes to a sense of phrasing. Having a bigger 2 in one bar as opposed to smaller 4 beats. Counting in 4 could possibly lead to more choppy phrasing, and dwindling too much on the LH 8th notes. Feeling in 2, one could have a better grasp of the flow of the harmony and melodic line.
It is more a matter of how beats are felt rather than how fast to beat.
Logged
Made a Liszt. Need new Handel's for Soler panel & Alkan foil. Will Faure Stein on the way to pick up Mendels' sohn. Josquin get Wolfgangs Schu with Clara. Gone Chopin, I'll be Bach
b0mbtrack
PS Silver Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 81
Re: Two questions on Chopin Op 28 No 4 in e minor
Reply #2 on: February 27, 2009, 03:29:52 PM
Thanks for the help. Its a little confusing having the cut in half time but I do understand what you are saying about it just being a feel and that it would be choppy the other way. Thanks again
Logged
why does it hurt when i pee
davide n.
PS Silver Member
Newbie
Posts: 8
Re: Two questions on Chopin Op 28 No 4 in e minor
Reply #3 on: January 05, 2012, 12:42:02 PM
Hello everyone,
I'd like to speak about two things in this piece: tempo marking and the meaning of "espressivo".
First of all, I'm not studying on high level but only as amateur and therefore I know just a little of history of music. But what I've read around the web about Chopin, particularly
Angela Lear's article
, is that he was a precise composer and very exigent to his interpreters.
For this reason, my first problem is: what is the tempo really meant?
As much as I know
"Largo" means slow, i.e few bpm and the cut 4/4 tempo means a beat every half note.
As a logic conclusion, the largo is to be intend every half note. According to this, the vast majority of the recordings are way too slow.
Has Chopin made a "mistake", maybe for lazyness? Are all pianists "wrong" for not understanding? Has he let the freedom for one time? ...?
Second problem: is "espressivo" referred only to the first bar (or "phrase") (b... b b!......), or to the whole piece? And what does practically "espressivo" mean in Chopin's mind?
I mean, the meaning of a word can change in the time and being even subjective. For example, in Italian the word "patetico" has a very negative connotation, like "ridiculous", but we all know its ethymology.
Thanks to anyone who replies and sorry if I made mistakes!
Logged
Sign-up to post reply
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
For more information about this topic, click search below!
Search on Piano Street