Personally I find good music shines through poor recording quality or shabby instruments. When one is presented with good music it comes to the forefront ahead of any equipment deficiencies. quantum
Hi quantum,
I agree with you on this only 101%. I have to show my age here

, but when I was a kid there were still 78 rpm records around that we played with sapphire needles. (Diamond needles were reserved for 33 rpm LPs.) On those ancient records, there were scratches, snaps, crackles, pops, and whatever. But as musicians, we all could instantly tune out the noise, and shining through it all would come the artistry of Paderewsky, Brailowski, Cortot, Hofmann, Gieseking, or whomever. We all just took that "filtering" ability for granted.
Today, perfect digital sound and error-free performances are the thing. On an early recording, you might hear Rubinstein fluffing a note in the low bass, but we were all still in awe of him as a great artist. Now, the recording engineer fixes wrong notes with sampling, enhances the volume of inner lines, cuts and pastes a passage from "Take 3" into "Take 5", etc. to produce a pristine CD. Ah, the dubious wonders of software editing!
The problem is that consumers actually believe the pianist played it that way! And then when they're at a live recital and the artist takes a risk and plays a klinker, it's like, "Wow, can this be true?" There's that story of the concert pianist who had a bad recording day. He was sent home by the recording engineer, and returned to the studio a few days later to listen to and approve his CD. He was beaming. Then the recording engineer turned to him and said sardonically, "Yes, don't you wish YOU could play like that?"

When I record, I do full takes only and patently refuse to edit anything. I simply listen to all the takes several times, make eliminations, then submit the one I consider to be best. That way I always feel that my recordings are authentic, not contrived.
So, for example, when it comes to a piano with a very minor tuning issue like a couple of notes slightly off in the high treble, or a wrong note in performance, a bird chirping in the distance, or whatever, I can "listen through" that stuff and still enjoy someone's rendition tremendously. After all, most of us do home recordings here. It's unfortunate, but the filtering by the ear that I refer to seems to be a totally lost ability now. Listeners want perfection, whether it's real or not. I think we're poorer for that.