Home
Piano Music
Piano Music Library
Audiovisual Study Tool
Search pieces
All composers
Top composers »
Bach
Beethoven
Brahms
Chopin
Debussy
Grieg
Haydn
Mendelssohn
Mozart
Liszt
Prokofiev
Rachmaninoff
Ravel
Schubert
Schumann
Scriabin
All composers »
All pieces
Recommended Pieces
PS Editions
Instructive Editions
Recordings
Recent additions
Free piano sheet music
News & Articles
PS Magazine
News flash
New albums
Livestreams
Article index
Piano Forum
Resources
Music dictionary
E-books
Manuscripts
Links
Mobile
About
About PS
Help & FAQ
Contact
Forum rules
Pricing
Log in
Sign up
Piano Forum
Home
Help
Search
Piano Forum
»
Piano Board
»
Miscellaneous
»
Scanners
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Topic: Scanners
(Read 1591 times)
thalbergmad
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 16741
Scanners
on: June 14, 2009, 11:44:22 AM
Me scanner has started to produce some horrible results.
Looking at the before and after photoshop images of the same sheet, no matter what settings i use, i cannot get a clear scan.
Is this what normally happens when a scanner is about to die, or is there anything i can to do fix this?
If not, can anyone recommend a good quick A3 scanner, that is preferably NOT a Mustek.
Thal
Logged
Curator/Director
Concerto Preservation Society
tanman
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 923
Re: Scanners
Reply #1 on: June 14, 2009, 11:54:36 AM
btw I still haven't fixed my scanner
Logged
Remember, imitation is the sincerest form of identity theft.
allthumbs
Sr. Member
Posts: 1632
Re: Scanners
Reply #2 on: June 14, 2009, 06:18:37 PM
Thal
I had a closer look at your scan. While I am not an expert, I have had some good results scanning. So before you toss out your scanner, here are some tips you may wish to consider.
First I would use the .tif format instead of .jpeg for b&w images. It seems to work better for a reason that I am unable to explain.
Also, I would use 300 dpi and not the 100 dpi that your scanner was set on. You'll get a much sharper image.
If you were getting better scans before, perhaps it is your scanner, but before you toss it out, check the following as well, in case some settings were changed.
You may already be doing this, so bear with me.
Use the 'Line Art' setting and not 'Colour' or 'Gray' setting. I also would use a low threshold setting or between 75-125 depending on how dark the paper is (brown with age).
I have attached a pdf of a raw untouched .tif file using the settings laid out here. The original .tif image used was much larger at 2544 X 3470 pixels, but smaller size 137kb than your file. The resulting pdf is smaller in size still. I couldn't attach the tif image by itself.
As for your image, this is what I did to improve your 'before' image in photoshop. I did get a slightly better result (attached).
1. On the task bar in photoshop click on
Select
, drop down to
Color Range
and click. The Color Range box will appear.
2. Select
Highlights
and click
OK
. This will cause the image to shimmer.
3. Go to
Edit
on the taskbar, click on
Cut
and it will clean up the image.
4. Go to
Image
on the taskbar, drop down to
Adjust
then click on
Brightness/Contrast
. A small box will appear. Leave the Brightness selection alone and shift the Contrast slider to the right until you feel the image is dark enough and click
OK
.
5. You can then crop the image by selecting the
Rectangular Marquee Tool
. Outline the area on the image you want to keep, go to
Image
on the Taskbar and click on
Crop
.
Save you image and you can do further cleanup touches and 'de-speckling' in 'Paint'
I hope that helps and is clear as mud.
allthumbs
Logged
Sauter Delta (185cm) polished ebony 'Lucy'
Serial # 118 562
thalbergmad
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 16741
Re: Scanners
Reply #3 on: June 14, 2009, 07:10:58 PM
Thanks for your response old chap.
My scanner produces bitmap images. I then convert them to jpegs as these tend to compress well and produce pdf's of reasonable size. Each page is generally about 1mb as a bitmap.
I have always used "grey scale" on my Mustek scanner as using the black and white settings tends to highlight the notes on a score and make the lines invisible. Using a higher resolution tends to highlight any imperfections on the paper, but i will try your suggestions on photoshop.
Looking at a few reports on the Mustek, the problems i am having do tend to happen after a while and i guess after 3 years and 18,000 pages i should not be moaning.
I am sure some of your suggestions would improve things, but i think that a new scanner that produces a better image in the first place is required. Due to the amount of old junk i scan, i try not to spend too much time tarting up the images.
Any suggestions on a good A3 scanner??
Regs
Thal
Logged
Curator/Director
Concerto Preservation Society
thalbergmad
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 16741
Re: Scanners
Reply #4 on: June 14, 2009, 07:20:32 PM
These images that i produced only a week ago are more than satisfactory??
Logged
Curator/Director
Concerto Preservation Society
allthumbs
Sr. Member
Posts: 1632
Re: Scanners
Reply #5 on: June 14, 2009, 07:30:03 PM
Quote from: thalbergmad on June 14, 2009, 07:20:32 PM
These images that i produced only a week ago are more than satisfactory??
These are much better. You could get slightly sharper images by increasing the dpi and I adjusted the contrast in the attached file.
allthumbs
Logged
Sauter Delta (185cm) polished ebony 'Lucy'
Serial # 118 562
thalbergmad
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 16741
Re: Scanners
Reply #6 on: June 14, 2009, 07:32:25 PM
HAHA, i think i just send all my papers to you. That would be much easier.
Thal
Logged
Curator/Director
Concerto Preservation Society
oxy60
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 1479
Re: Scanners
Reply #7 on: June 15, 2009, 01:00:59 AM
This has been a most intersting dialog. Even more so because I have never heard of Mustec. Here in the States and in Europe I use Epson printing and scanning equipment exclusively. I'm sure they make an A3.
Logged
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir (We all need to get out more.)
Bob
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 16367
Re: Scanners
Reply #8 on: June 15, 2009, 04:43:11 AM
What's A3?
Logged
Favorite new teacher quote -- "You found the only possible wrong answer."
thalbergmad
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 16741
Re: Scanners
Reply #9 on: June 15, 2009, 07:15:58 AM
2 x A4
Logged
Curator/Director
Concerto Preservation Society
gep
Sr. Member
Posts: 747
Re: Scanners
Reply #10 on: June 15, 2009, 08:07:04 AM
Quote from: thalbergmad on June 15, 2009, 07:15:58 AM
2 x A4
2 x a 4 = a 8?
I think Alistair has a A3 scanner, and even has used a A2 scanner, so he may have pointers for you here?
Gep
Logged
In the long run, any words about music are less important than the music. Anyone who thinks otherwise is not worth talking to (Shostakovich)
retrouvailles
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 2851
Re: Scanners
Reply #11 on: June 15, 2009, 08:30:10 AM
Quote from: Bob on June 15, 2009, 04:43:11 AM
What's A3?
Why not just Wiki it instead of asking here? You'll get a quicker answer.
Logged
Bob
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 16367
Re: Scanners
Reply #12 on: June 15, 2009, 11:17:48 AM
I have an idea, but I'm wondering how it relates to music.
It's a paper size I know. But with music and scanners, I'm wondering.
Logged
Favorite new teacher quote -- "You found the only possible wrong answer."
thalbergmad
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 16741
Re: Scanners
Reply #13 on: June 15, 2009, 04:05:07 PM
It don't relate to music.
I need an A3 scanner as sheet music used to be published oversize A4 or larger and many of the copies i get from libraries are A3 size.
My scanner is dead and i have a backlog of 25 concertos, so i had better get movin.
Thal
Logged
Curator/Director
Concerto Preservation Society
Sign-up to post reply
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
For more information about this topic, click search below!
Search on Piano Street