Richard Kastle
I usually like animals though.
monkeys (eek eek eek!)
(eek eek eek!) (woof, woof, woof!),
me too. i love nature (and animals included ) very much. but those listed!?
What listed? You're the one who wants us list what *animals u hate* perhaps *dislike* or *not tolerate* would be a better choice of words. I like animals too and nature.
Mosquitoes.. I don't mind them, cause they don't bite me! woohoo!
Thank you for the audible aid
I also can't stand those little nasty dogs people put in there pockets
'i also can't stand those nasty people who put little dogs in their pockets'
Those two.
Wow so many spelling and grammar errors in this thread! Spell/grammar check, people!
I'll just say that the newest Firefox has an automatic spell checker. I suggest you get it, or some sort of equivalent.
Wow so many spelling and grammar errors in this thread!
It is best to place an exclamatory mark after an exclamatory word, for example, Wow!, No!, and Behold!Also, the word There needs to be used before a predicate and a subject, e.g. There are so many people here.Hence, the corrected version is as follows: "Wow! There are so many spelling and grammar errors in this thread!"
With all due respect, I am a native English speaker, whereas you are not, so I think I know my grammar rules better than you.
And besides, my spelling/grammar checker said it was correct,..
corrected version: "With all due respect, I am a native English speaker, whereas you are not. So I think I know my grammar rules better than you do"
great many bad spelling/grammar checkers out and about, including the very widely used ones.https://faculty.washington.edu/sandeep/check/
indeed, lemme correct sum of it 4 u :
Actually, that version is incorrect. Mine is correct. The phrase "whereas you are not" acts as an interruptive clause, which is supposed to be placed in between the clauses "I am a native English speaker" and "so I think I know my grammar rules better than you". It is not supposed to have a period after the interruptive clause.
But I hate spiders Why did those nasty things exist!!
den its an incorrect use of interruptive clause. an interruptive clause should be used to explain the condition of the previous clause. eg my car, which used to be red, is now black2nd item:wrong: " i know my grammar rules better than you"rite: " i know my grammar rules better than you do"
It is not an incorrect use. I was explaining the previous clause (you are not a native English speaker).
Also, you are still committing a great many errors in this thread, such as your lack of capitalization of the first letter of a new sentence and such things as this:Why didn't you bother to correct that?
"I am a native English speaker, whereas you are not, so I think I know my grammar rules better than you" retrouvaillesyour so-called interruptive clause ("whereas you are not") does not explain the condition of the previous clause ("I am a native English speaker"). your "whereas-you-are-not" is a completely unrelated matter, and so it cannot be qualified as a legitimate interruptive clause.read again my suggested version: "I am a native English speaker, whereas you are not. So I think I know my grammar rules better than you do"now compare that with yours! the corrected version is far clearer.a side note: being a native english speaker does not automatically mean that you know about grammar rules than all non english speakers. i lived in english speaking countries for ten years, and God knows how many the so-called native english speakers simply suck at spelling and grammar! i never mind my spelling and grammar in a forum. in fact, i enjoy the informality and the fun they tend to generate. it was you who wanted correct spelling and grammar. if i wanted to make corrections of sumthing, which i did, it was merely becoz i wanted to have fun. is it hard to understand?
Although they are harmless, huntsmen spiders. They can be as big as your hand and crawl over your pillow at night and scare the @)#(*@()# out of you.
I know you live in perth beware of redback spider