Hardly obscure and Weber is romantic in my opinion.Thal
Weber is classical. Have you heard the piano concerti?
I did not know how obscure they wanted and Hummel is not exactly performed often.
A hell of a lot of Hummel has been recorded. He is not even remotely obscure.Thal
Yes thanks and they would be one of the reasons i would put him in the romantic bracket. With the Concertstuck, even more so.Thal
I think they are great ROMANTIC concerti. If they were not romantic, Hyperion would not have recorded them in that series.I find it difficult to debate with someone who likened Mendelssohn to Schumann in another thread Thal
Weber leans towards full blown romanticism in his concerti to a greater degree than Kalkbrenner in my opinion, especially in the 2nd concerto and konzertstuck.Kalkbrenner is amongst the group of composers that bridged the gap between classical and romantic, but he more than warrants his place in the Hyperion series as his concerti "can" be used as effective virtuoso display vehicles.You are picking the wrong pieces for your argument here. If they were not Romantic Concerti, Hyperion would not have recorded them thus.Thal
This is a thread about composers of the classical school and the thread initiator was interested in obscure composers.Weber is an entirely inappropriate example as he is not obscure and he is not classical.Xenakis would have been a better example.Thal
I find this all very surprising. Weber is surely early romantic, and he's not obscure at all.
You don't think some of his pieces sound Classical?
In response to the initial query, Dussek is the most obvious suggestion.