I don't think these two concertos are THAT similar to Moszkowski. Moszkowski's concerto is in a much closer vein to Chopin, and has that kind of delicacy to it. Melcer's are a bit more harder edged and with a bit more harmonic invention. Just look at the opening of the finale of the second concerto!
Well, thanks 2 both of you. Now, if you don't mind, can you give me a rundown of you're favorite X. Scharwenka's 4 concerti, as well as his piano music in general. I recall seeing several of his pieces in my family's music collection, and may have played a few smaller works when I was young, but I've never had a chance to explore his output, and from some of the reading I've done, he seems undeservedly underrepresented in performance (and recordings?). There must be some low-cost CDs of his music available, but I haven't done any searches for the best deals yet.Thanks again,L.
If you are gonna buy CD's from this composer, I would avoid the Hamelin recording of the 1st concerto. It contains some of the most boring and unimaginative playing in history. It would be better to try and find a piano roll rather than listen to that dross.Thal
But what can you tell me of Scharwenka's solo piano music?
I personally really admire Myaskovsky for his symphonies (particularly the masterly 6th). However, his piano sonatas have their moments (particularly the 3rd one). He wasn't one of the better piano composers, though. His symphonies are where his legacy lies. Too bad he didn't compose a piano concerto!