Home
Piano Music
Piano Music Library
Top composers »
Bach
Beethoven
Brahms
Chopin
Debussy
Grieg
Haydn
Mendelssohn
Mozart
Liszt
Prokofiev
Rachmaninoff
Ravel
Schubert
Schumann
Scriabin
All composers »
All composers
All pieces
Search pieces
Recommended Pieces
Audiovisual Study Tool
Instructive Editions
Recordings
PS Editions
Recent additions
Free piano sheet music
News & Articles
PS Magazine
News flash
New albums
Livestreams
Article index
Piano Forum
Resources
Music dictionary
E-books
Manuscripts
Links
Mobile
About
About PS
Help & FAQ
Contact
Forum rules
Pricing
Log in
Sign up
Piano Forum
Home
Help
Search
Piano Forum
»
Piano Board
»
Repertoire
»
Otto Singer (transcriptions vs. Liszt) + Value of symphonic transcriptions
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Topic: Otto Singer (transcriptions vs. Liszt) + Value of symphonic transcriptions
(Read 6724 times)
delude
PS Silver Member
Newbie
Posts: 11
Otto Singer (transcriptions vs. Liszt) + Value of symphonic transcriptions
on: December 23, 2009, 06:32:22 PM
In my explorations of IMSLP, I have come across the name Otto Singer quite frequently, as a transcriber, editor, and even as a composer. He seems to have worked with a variety of publishers. He transcribed Tchaikovsky symphonies, Brahms symphonies, Mahler symphonies, Strauss works, Bruckner symphonies, Mozart symphonies, Bizet's Carmen, Schubert symphonies, Wagner works, etc., and etc., for both 2 hands and 4 hands.
Here is a short Wikipedia blurb about him:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Singer
From my research elsewhere, I have learned that his transcription of Mahler's 5th is probably the one played by Mahler (with additions) on that Welte-Mignon piano roll. And also that Singer was in contact with Liszt through letters. I am curious why Singer would write the transcriptions of Beethoven, being such an "earnest and aggressive disciple of Liszt," who, of course, had already transcribed all of the symphonies. I guess C.F. Peters (publisher of the Singer transcriptions) wanted to compete with Breitkopf & Härtel (publisher of the Liszt)? It would be interesting to compare the two.
Has anyone here any opinion of Otto Singer's transcriptions or any other information about him?
Also, how valuable really are symphonic transcriptions for a pianist? Could they find a place in the repertoire of a pianist interested in uncommon repertoire? Or is this true only when the trascriber has a solid reputation (as with Liszt), or when the composer transcribes their own works?
Logged
richard black
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 2104
Re: Otto Singer (transcriptions vs. Liszt) + Value of symphonic transcriptions
Reply #1 on: December 24, 2009, 01:44:32 PM
First thing: I have the idea (though I can't remember where I got it from) that there are two Otto Singers, father and son - which would account for a rather long productive life.
Anyway, I've played lots of opera vocal scores arranged by Otto Singer and they're not bad, not necessarily the best ever but certainly very far from the worst. Concert transcriptions seem rather less interesting - they're mostly done along the same lines as the opera vocal scores, i.e. pretty literal, which is perfect for opera rehearsing purposes but a bit dull for concert performance.
Logged
Instrumentalists are all wannabe singers. Discuss.
birba
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 3725
Re: Otto Singer (transcriptions vs. Liszt) + Value of symphonic transcriptions
Reply #2 on: December 24, 2009, 04:55:36 PM
Interesting thread. There is an Otto Singer who died in 1931, so maybe it IS this otto Singer's son. I've been battling with Singer's editions of Elektra, salome, etc. for 30 years now, and most of it is NOT pianistic at all. (read: impossible) But then again I never expect an opera score to be playable. They present all the orchestral possibilities and you choose the necessary ones. So, there is a big difference between piano transcriptions to be played in full in public, and piano transcriptions to be plowed through in stage rehearsals.
Logged
Sign-up to post reply
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up