pletnev, kissin & zimerman?
They are fine, but I'm more of an 'old school' person. Horowitz, Rubinstein, Cziffra, Gilels, Sofronitsky, Lipatti. You get the idea.
It is better to have bad quality recordings than bad quality playing.Thal
is it though? If it's all crackly it distracts you from the music, and today there aren't really any performers who record with mistakes left in, so if you want to hear the music then I reckon a modern cd is better.
disappiontment.
Waht is taht?Bset,Alisztair
Some of my old Paderewski 78's are of good quality. I can cope with the odd crackle.No mistakes recordings are not human and when you hear the pianist live, this can lead to disappiontment.Thal
A very spontaneous list: Andsnes, Hamelin, Zimerman (despite his whackjob attitude lately), Gilels, Aimard, Hough, in no order. I suppose I'm more of a forward thinker than most people here, aside from my Gilels nomination. These days, however, I don't see myself that picky about pianists, for with much of the repertoire I listen to, I don't have much of a choice sometimes.
He just seems like a stodgy English pianist who wears a funny hat to give the impression of exoticism.
Depends on period composerBach baroque - GouldScarlatti - Kilpatrick, PoglorichHaydn - BrendalMozart - BarenboimBeethoven - Schnabel, RichterChopin - Argerich, Rubenstein, GodowskyLiszt - Howard, Bolet, Kissin (just - takes a lot of liberties)Russian romantics - Bereskovsky, HorowitzDebussy - ?Ravel - RavelProkofiev - Richter, Prokofiev, HorowitzAlbeniz - UchidaOf course there are scores of great pianists not mentioned, but (as a generalisation) the above "stand out" for me.
No mistakes recordings are not human and when you hear the pianist live, this can lead to disappiontment.Thal
Totaly agree. I don't really see why they record pieces to (almost) perfection, when there is no way they'll be able to play like that in concert. It's quite stupid...
And it kinda sucks that that is what international piano competitions demand these days...