Home
Piano Music
Piano Music Library
Top composers »
Bach
Beethoven
Brahms
Chopin
Debussy
Grieg
Haydn
Mendelssohn
Mozart
Liszt
Prokofiev
Rachmaninoff
Ravel
Schubert
Schumann
Scriabin
All composers »
All composers
All pieces
Search pieces
Recommended Pieces
Audiovisual Study Tool
Instructive Editions
Recordings
PS Editions
Recent additions
Free piano sheet music
News & Articles
PS Magazine
News flash
New albums
Livestreams
Article index
Piano Forum
Resources
Music dictionary
E-books
Manuscripts
Links
Mobile
About
About PS
Help & FAQ
Contact
Forum rules
Pricing
Log in
Sign up
Piano Forum
Home
Help
Search
Piano Forum
»
Piano Board
»
Student's Corner
»
Gauging the Appropriate Difficulty For Me
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Topic: Gauging the Appropriate Difficulty For Me
(Read 1633 times)
njordan
PS Silver Member
Newbie
Posts: 3
Gauging the Appropriate Difficulty For Me
on: August 20, 2010, 05:18:48 PM
I am in my mid 30s and self-teaching, although I did have several years of lessons as a young child. My skill level is in the late-beginner, early-intermeadiate range (working on pieces ranked level 3-4 by this site, such as Celmenti Op 36-1 & 3, Kuhlau Op 55-1). I consider sight-reading one of the weak points. I am typically able to play a new piece HS reasonably well the first time, but HT takes several hours per page.
I find that well before I am able to play a piece, it is memorized. Does this suggest that I am working on pieces that are too difficult? Should I concentrate more on pieces that are easy enough to master before memorization occurs?
Any advice would be appreciated.
Logged
alessandro
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 293
Re: Gauging the Appropriate Difficulty For Me
Reply #1 on: August 20, 2010, 08:16:54 PM
You sound - though your post is very short - as if you have enthusiasm (which is one of the most important things), and that you are 'normal' in the sense that you consider in your 'self-teaching' modus sight-reading as your "weak" point. It can be a uninevitable obstacle, reading the score. It would be so nice to have a new score in front of oneself and playing it 'on the go', isn't it. Though there are people who are more talented for sight-reading as others, I am a mediocre sight-reader, but that's it. No more, no less. Then comes the technique. Playing things over and over again, hundreds of times, and still not getting them right. You shouldn't worry too much about sight reading. From my experience, it goes better and better, the more you sight-read, simple. I'm talking for the mainstream, romantic and baroque repertoire. I never had a Messiaen or a Sorabji-score in front of me. So, just practice a lot, reading will become easier.
But I think that you need to be a little more precise when you say "HT takes several hours per page". What kind of page are you talking about ? And why have all of your pieces memorized before you play it. I don't see the sense of that. Of course, if it's easier for you, why not ?, but I'm not an adept of having the piece 'fully' memorized before I tackle it, frankly.
Kindly.
Kindly.
Logged
Sign-up to post reply
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up