...............
I had gotten used to its presence, so I purchased a beard trimmer in Edinburgh and - er - the rest is - er - "history" (or at least it would have been so had such an utterly trivial matter been worthy of any kind of historical record).
Facts like these are important. When you get around to publishing your memoirs, little trinkets like this will brighten things up a bit.
(are you reading this, "mephisto"?,
I certainly did
THE ADVENTURES OF "AHINTON"
Question: did you get permission from all people shown? If not, it would mean you are someone who does not hesitate to publish what seems a rather private photo of other people without their knowledge and/or consent.
After all there is a famous composer in the shot who could reasonably expect to be photographed. If one is at the same table, they should put a bag over their head if they are concerned.
In this case, it would have been an improvement if the famous composer had.
Well gep you may have a point. I really don't know if people in a public place doing normal activities can claim privacy. After all there is a famous composer in the shot who could reasonably expect to be photographed. If one is at the same table, they should put a bag over their head if they are concerned.
I must disagree here. I know we live in a world where privacy is increasingly eroded, but I do not think that when someone is in a (small) public space it means they should be OK with having there photograph being published - without their consent or even knowledge - in a worldwide public space. People aren't public property the moment they leave their home.
I think we are entering into a fantasy land here. This is not a picture published in the Sun of William & Kate in the bath at the Dorchester, it is a well known composer, a stupendous pianist and unknown female in Pizza Hut after a concert.
Stubble appears to be back in fashion
you could tastefully drape yourself over your piano with a suitably placed Sorabji score.
Phew, you had me worried for a minute, but then I realised that men are usually on page 7 of the Sun. I see no reason why you should not be a "page 7 fella". Stubble appears to be back in fashion and you could tastefully drape yourself over your piano with a suitably placed Sorabji score.
It's funny how when you read someone's words and opinions over a period of time in a website like this, not knowing what they are physically like, you sort of develop a picture of what they look like in your mind. You look nothing like what I imagined...
Which baffles me. Nature is strangely arranged; I can't stand stubble, let alone a beard, but no matter how often I shave it keeps growing back. Yet while I would like to keep the hair on my head, it keeps receding. Although scientists recently announced that bald(ing) men still have all the hairs on their head, you just can't see them. Well, that's a relief.... all best,gep
The photograph is not public domain, most likely.
Anyone in the photograph may feel free to provide proof of ownership and/or copyright to likeness of image and have the image removed, and subsequently sue the person who distributed it for all damages incurred.That is the state of affairs.
Considering none of that is going to happen, let's get back to the puns, and despite Thal's involvement, let's please try to keep them tasteful; no sax and violins.