It sounds like a Revolutionary War era march to me. *Waves Flag*
You know I think I actually did similar things to this as well. I think I would have called them "riffs" back in the day. Though maybe that was different. Once I made a "riff," I would practice it. Almost like tiny bits of pieces. Are you able to repeat this once you've played it or is it like, you have it in your head temporarily, play it as it was in your head, and then forget it?
So I think you're going through some natural stages of development, at least for someone who is interested in common practice era harmony and composition, which you seem to be and which I am as well. You've already got the knack for spontaneous improvisation---just don't lose that! I think of all the musical skills, it is definitely the most powerful. Though traditional harmony, progressions, "riffs," etc. are useful if they serve your purpose.
Yeah, there are some things like that, and some others that aren't. I guess I've been doing that since childhood, in some way, but yes, I always thought of these little fragments as a musical idea which I would develop ... so, somewhere in me, it always felt a bit attached to a bigger idea, even if I couldn't quite articulate that bigger idea yet. I think that mentality is left over a bit, and I hadn't ever thought of having "riffs" that I might put into several different improvisations (though, that does occur in some of my improvs, I realize).
m1469, I think what you are doing here will contribute to your growth as an improviser. Seems like you are trying to distinguish elements of your intention and execution - the idea you had in your head, and the manner in which it did (or did not) play out as you performed it. As I have been discovering in my recent improvising work, these thought processes are important elements in the improvisation chain of thought. Awareness of the idea as it passes from incarnation in intention, through to physical execution, and the reaction afterward will add focus to the activity. Sort of like a composers sketchbook. One which they carry around to jot down any spontaneous ideas that pop in their head. It may not have any coherence or context in the moment, but may prove valuable at a later date.
I am *just* becoming "allowed" in my consciousness to let myself carry ideas over from one musical setting to another (not that it hasn't already occurred, but I was kind of ashamed when it would). For some odd reason, I had developed this notion that absolutely everything that came into my consciousness had to be like a fresh little manna from heaven, and in no way, no portion of which, could possibly be derived from anything I've ever heard or played before. Which is absolutely ridiculous, I see now, on so many levels. I mean, if you take Classical music (the actual era), for example, there is *so* much material that gets re-used in different contexts from one composer to another, and then within each composer's total output. So, just that one little example, I'm not sure what I was thinking. I mean, there are *so* many basic ideas and compositional formats that get used over and over again in the music I admire and by the individuals I admire, so what's my problem on that one, exactly?