Home
Piano Music
Piano Music Library
Top composers »
Bach
Beethoven
Brahms
Chopin
Debussy
Grieg
Haydn
Mendelssohn
Mozart
Liszt
Prokofiev
Rachmaninoff
Ravel
Schubert
Schumann
Scriabin
All composers »
All composers
All pieces
Search pieces
Recommended Pieces
Audiovisual Study Tool
Instructive Editions
Recordings
PS Editions
Recent additions
Free piano sheet music
News & Articles
PS Magazine
News flash
New albums
Livestreams
Article index
Piano Forum
Resources
Music dictionary
E-books
Manuscripts
Links
Mobile
About
About PS
Help & FAQ
Contact
Forum rules
Pricing
Log in
Sign up
Piano Forum
Home
Help
Search
Piano Forum
»
Piano Board
»
Teaching
»
Burgmuller Op 105
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Topic: Burgmuller Op 105
(Read 3835 times)
cjp_piano
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 496
Burgmuller Op 105
on: August 28, 2011, 07:53:18 PM
Anyone very familiar with these pieces? I really like the C minor study, no. 2, was wondering about what level it is. Jane Magrath's guide puts Op. 105 as level 9 (1-10 beg to early adv). But I wondered specifically about the C minor study, number 2. Anyone?
Logged
ionian_tinnear
PS Silver Member
Full Member
Posts: 132
Re: Burgmuller Op 105
Reply #1 on: August 29, 2011, 02:03:26 PM
Opus 105 is a great set. #2 is one of the easy ones, and I don't think I'd rate it a 9 of 10 in difficulty, more like a 5, but these numbering systems for difficulty confuse me as do the grade numbers. What is easy for me could be hard for someone else, and something easy for someone else might be hard for me.
Even though #2 isn't very hard, it has a technical challenge, so it's still good to learn, as is the entire opus 105. Some of the pieces get very hard indeed, but most are fun and melodic as the composer intended. I play them often.
Logged
Albeniz: Suite Espaņola #1, Op 47,
Bach: French Suite #5 in G,
Chopin: Andante Spianato,
Chopin: Nocturne F#m, Op 15 #2
Chopin: Ballade #1 Gm & #3 Aflat Mj
cjp_piano
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 496
Re: Burgmuller Op 105
Reply #2 on: August 31, 2011, 04:51:12 PM
Well, the numbered systems can be confusing, but the idea is to group pieces together with similar difficulty. Just to say it's a "9" or a "5" doesn't mean anything unless you know OTHER pieces that are a 9 or a 5. That was my original question: how difficult do you think op. 105 no. 2 is? Not a numbered answer unless you say which system you're using
Macgrath 9
ABRSM 5
NMCP/TAP 7
etc.
So, when you say it's a "5", what other pieces are a 5?
Logged
Sign-up to post reply
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up