... the piano technique used, all in few words.================================================I - Piano Concerto Op.180 No.3 (F minor) "The Hands of Destiny"================================================I a) Personal considerations This is my favorite Concerto (I wrote 5) - And the reasons for thatis, I was able to do exactly what I want, and I was perfectly satisfied with the results. I dedicated this concerto of a man that gave me a lot of encouragement, called Merv Hansen, and when many was against(bad criticism that I received) , he stayed firmly on my site writingmany reviews that encouraged me to continue.I thing I will never forget this man. is like an angel that come from heaven.On that moment I was need some encouragement and he comes to talk some about my music that I need to hear on that time.Ib) Why I write "neo-romantic" music and my influences My repertory as a pianist was always focused on romantics. I performed a lot of Chopin. Some Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Brahms, Rachmaninnoff, and my favorite composer, Tchaikovsky. I always had interest to study more and more his Piano Concerto no.1, that I consider one of the most perfect and beautiful piano concertos ever written, as well adding Rachmaninoff No.2.I don`t realize at first, but every piece that I performed, I studied as a pianistbut also as a composer researching how the composer wrote the music,especially regarding the form.So, after that the composer was born naturally, as a result of that researches.Since that, some of these works inspired me to create my own.First my ambitions become to write solo piano music, following the forms that I already know, like preludes, fantasies, theme and variations, etudes, suites, impromptu, ballade, nocturnes, etc, and later on to expand and modify the formssoon my writings become more mature and frequently. Then I started to write using more complex forms like "rhapsodies" in my on way, the last nocturnes scherzo, ballade, and the last etudes too, as well more complex descriptive music.After years writing solo piano music, and when I felt more "secure" of myself, I decideto fly more "up" and try to write piano concertos.Ic) Form, structure, piano technique used etc My music is neo-romantic, tonal, and I consider myself a "melodist", and my music don`t use "Lizst" kind of technique; but my musichave technique enough to keep a pianist busy and to give great enjoyment to play. Without too many technical demands the pianist will have more time to focus on issues like interpretation, dynamics, and expression. Talking about form and structure - I tried make things "different", for exampleinstead of use a Sonata form on first movement, I prefer the Lied form.Also is cyclical since it`s use a cell theme (look for the intro octaves on piano)that will be used in different ways on the second (canzonetta) and third (sonata). The orchestral intro of the second movement I decided to use as a startingpoint of the development section at the third, to give to the musicmore cohesion and make it more uniform - create connections between movements.Also my intention is to use the first and the second movement as one "Introduction" before the "third," so in fact it can be considered the "first", main movement (that is why it is a "Sonata" movement and not - RONDO.)4 of my 5 piano concertos I used "sad" (minor) keys. Maybe because this was themain key of the music I studied as well, and also because I love do the transitionto "major" on the second movements, to return to "minor" on the finale.The only exception is the Concerto No.5 called "Juvenile" (Eb Major).In fact, mostly of my solo piano music is written using "minor" key.The concerto have a very small cadenza, before ends.It`s use the second theme to build the climax to finish the piece, one thing that Tchaikovsky and Grieg (another favorite) used, and later by Rachmaninoff (no.2 and no.3).================================================II - Piano Concerto Op.209 No.4 (Bb minor) "The Last Batlle"================================================This concerto I consider the most "standard" concerto I wrote,since the movements is Sonata (Eb minor) /Lied (Eb Major) /Rondo (Eb minor).I tried, also "expand" the form and, make it more difficult regardingthe technique used - as well.The cadenza (on the first movement), was, also, expanded - and more difficult.The first movement uses one Intro, before the exposition of the 2 themesdevelopment section and reexposition - on the first movement. The intro will be used also, to finish the movement.So is like INTRO - CENTRAL PART (EXPOSITION /DEVELOPMENT /REEXPOSITIONOF 2 THEMES - INTRO kind of structure)The second movement is a lied form (A-B-A), but also expanded.The "A" part is expressivo, melodic, and the second part ("B") more "Agitato",technical.The third movement is a Rondo/Sonata, and also descriptive.Imagine around midnight and some Ghost dancing a waltz in an empty, abandoned old mansion. They dancing as they flying up to the ground.I consider my fourth concerto compared with my third, as the Rachmaninoffthird is with the second: Expanded, and more difficult.The most of the technical difficulties is on the Cadenza (first movement)and on the "B" part of the second movement.The third have some parts that require training, but the most of itis perfect manageable.
PC 4: The first movement was good. I love the ocatves, obviously depicting the intensity of the battle. It was ferocious. Well named! There were some nice moments too, which were pretty calm. The second movement: The beginning reminds me of Rachmaninoff's 3rd PC where the orchestra plays for a while before the piano comes in. Some nice melodic themes too!
Thanks for your review. be careful, is not ocatves but octaves.About my second movement "reminds" Rachmaninoff only because the orchestraenters and expose the themes before the piano... not make sense at all, because structure and form is not the "music" but the manner of construction of something and the disposition of its parts. When some structural and musical formbecome standard, everybody uses it. Like the Sonata form, that was used by MozartHaydn, Beethoven for example. But musically each one preserve their own identify.If you taking just one example, like the first movement of Chopin`s E minor piano concerto Op.11, you will realize that he uses to expose the themes on the orchestra before the piano (Hummel influence), but this not means that his concerto "reminds" Hummel`s music at all.Is just about the way the composer works to organize musical ideas.Doing one analogy, take the cars. Every car follow the standard structural rules, that is,the use of breaks, lights, etc. But each car have it`s own peculiarities regarding how to use that standards.The music is the same. take Beethoven and Mozart share the use of the same form called Sonata, but each one used the form in different way.Also the use of the second theme at the end of some piano concertos was shared by Grieg, Tchaikovsky (no.1) and Rachmaninoff (no.2 and 3). I used myself on my concerto no.3
Epic program notes! Nice that you typed them in because now I understand and appreciate your great works more. I loved your 1st movement of your 3rd PC, particularly the beginning when the piano first plays. The octaves sound funny! You have a degree of fire and intensity and calmness in your music which creates contrast, which I like very much. I want to hear more!
I'm sorry for my comments. You are right, the concerti are tragic and you are right, it really depicts a great struggle and a great outpouring of emotion. I'm sorry to insult your concerto making ridiculous comments. I should've known better. your concerti are serious and are great compositions, which I think deserved to be heard in everyone's ears. pleas don't take my bad comments into heart. I'm sorry.
Can you post some of the other concerti and perhaps even some extremely good selected compositions? Please do if someone has recorded them. I just want to try to review your compositions. I really think they are really nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Every time I hear your concerti, I discover something new and understand the music more and more, just like reading books. BTW I'm obssessed with your 4thPC. Hopefully I can discover alot more things in there.
Hi pianoplayjlI agree. From what I heard here, guisongs is a very worthy composer of note. Hopefully many of the members and visitors here will take time to listen to this marvelous work. The composer deserves a lot of credit in my opinion.David
Any nocturne that you recommend would be nice. Perhaps the one that is closest to your heart.
Hi guisongs,I really enjoyed hearing your concerto! The third movement was my favorite, but the entire concerto is wonderful. I congratulate you of this very fine achievement. You know, when the Modernists came along, they declared that the Romantic Age was bankrupt and finished. But the Late Romantics like Rachmaninoff, Catoire, Mendtner, Scriabin, Liadov, Liapunoff, Bortkiewicz and others proved that notion of the modernists to be wrong. And now, there is a whole new movement of Neo-Romantics like yourself proving over and and again that there is still an infinite amount of ideas, themes, passions, beauty, and ecstasy that enables Romanticism to persist and thrive in our time. It enriches our world and makes it a better place. Your concerto is a vibrant example of Neo-Romanticism at its best. Thank you for upholding the traditions and promises of this musical style that comes from the heart and feeds the soul.David
Dear David,Thanks a lot for your words - I posting now the concerto Op.215 no.5, the 29 preludesand the first 4 nocturnes (mp3 now, I need to produce the pdf after revising the nocturnes to post it more later, and perfect.) I feel happy that I have now you and Mr pianoplayjl to look deeply into my musicone thing that - at end - was the reason to me come here.Hope that I will be able to post a great number of works that can in the same timebe worthy of study, attract attention of pianists looking for new repertory, as well give inspiration to young generation of composers to have interest in create moretonal, neo-romantic music.