In Liszt's Sonetto 104 del Petrarca (how do you say 104 in Italian anyway), he has a section marked vibrato. How do you think he intended the to be interpreted?The same measure is marked stringendo and the increase in speed along with the left hand rhythm gives a good effect but I'm not sure if that's what is meant by the vibrato mark.
I think Liszt literally meant vibrato. I've read that he would wiggle his finger on a key after it was played to achieve a vibrato. I'll leave it to you to decide whether this has any effect or not. It doesn't in my opinion. BTW I'm learning this piece this semester.
You can achieve a vibrato effect with the pedal, and by vibrating your finger--on a clavichord, heh.koji (STSD)
Perhaps this might interest you...https://www.farid-hajji.net/fun/ge-humidrecital.html
I thought that this vibrato thing is all part of the mind?How does one achieve cresc and dim on just one note? I saw that in the Chopin Piano Concerto No. 1 (2 piano scores)? Wouldn the vibrato sign means playing it slightly different touch? With the image of the strings vibrato in mind....Regards,Zhiliang
Wouldn't that just be an accent with a decrescendo?