I suspect that it's how those hands are used, and that would include the body that these hands are part of.
I mean what's the best hand size that would leave you best off. If you know what I mean?
Ones about the size you've got. Your brain is used to working with them.Planning on getting new ones?
"People with small hands, like some female pianist from Asian, some had operation between thumb and index." What are you talking about. Asains are usually very fast and articulate on the piano.
I read somewhere that the shape of Chopin's hands and fingers wasn't entirely natural either.Nobody else seems to know this but he'd apparantly made a contraption when he was young to stretch his fingers(coz his fingers where quite small originally) and Robert Schumann who'd heard what Chopin had done wanted to make his fingers longer as well and damaged his hands in the process(the moral of the story being, to do it at a young age when fingers are still pliable).I guess it's a bit like penis enlargement. Some go for the contraption to stretch others for the operation. Anyhow, don't be judgemental about pianists prepared to do this, perhaps if it wasn't for his contraption, Chopin would have never become the pianist he became
There is no evidence whatsoever that Chopin actually used any such contraption. Further, to do so at a young age would be no safer that to do it later, and may in fact be more dangerous. Schumann's fate should serve as a warning to any tempted to try it.
There is no evidence whatsoever that Chopin actually used any such contraption. Further, to do so at a young age would be no safer that to do it later, and may in fact be more dangerous.
But you're really suggesting the elasticity is more in an adult than in a child or are you just trying to be contrary?
wasn't the schumann legend about the device just a more pleasant way of explaining the damage caused by the meds he took to try and treat a particularly nasty case of syphilis?
my mind autmatically tends to wander from boredom when we mention bobby...
Quite possibly. They had some pretty nasty "cures" in those days.Wash your mouth out!!
I'm suggesting that it is easier to damage bones and cartilage when it is growing and forming than once it has done so.
Methinks you've refuted yourself with your own answer
Well, Chopin's hand was not that big, but it had long fingers and wide stretches between index and middle, and pinky and ring fingers.
They're also normally a little less bronze than the ones pictured above.
I wear lots of spray tan
It'll also give your keyboard that antique ivory look.I'm allergic, so it makes me look like Godzilla's hand double.
If I have, the manner thereof escapes me.
I suggest you play with gloves and spray tan. - and try not to breath much, in case the vapours lead to respiratory arrest.
'forming'
It's much easier to wreck a pot on the wheel than after it's fired.
Don't you mean it's easier to form a pot on the wheel than after it's fired
Both are true. The activities you suggest, though, are more likely to malform than to form.
Chopin(and the people that admire the shape of his hands) would disagree
If you think it's so farfetched, speaking from own experience(and I started very late) my hands seem to have a slightly larger stretch than when I just started . I suppose playing the piano at a very young age is also hazardous to the 'normal development' of a child's hands?Is the will to transcend nature not part of being human?If Chopin was limited by what nature gave him, his spirit gave him the will to transcend his limitations, and this shows not only in the device he built at a a very young age but is characteristic for the music he made as well. I doubt if he would have listened if conformists like yourself told him not to do it coz it was 'unnatural' or if aghast faces around him told him he shouldn't do it coz it was 'terribly dangerous'
That said, there are plenty of aspiring pianists who ,through bad technique and trying to force things beyond what nature has provided, have in fact done great damage to their hands.
You keep insisting that Chopin used this "device", but as I have repeatedly said, there is no evidence whatsoever that this is the case. "I read it in a biography" simply does not cut the mustard.
Playing the piano IS unnatural and we're all the better for it. And the way I see it, unless you go really crazy, there's no such thing as bad technique just tense hands, if the hands are fully relaxed, not only will the playing be more fluent but it will be almost impossible to injure yourself
Some people say the same about jelqing, that there's no evidence that it works, that it's just an urban myth, but as I write these words there are thousands if not hundreds of thousands that have learnt that it's not jelqing but that it's only possible with expensive surgery that's the myth
4 million threads on this forum appear to be devoted to that subject. I do not care to add to their number
I will bow to your greater experience on that subject. Shocked
That said, I fail to see the relevance. The question at hand is whether or not Chopin used any device to achieve his hand shape; and I say emphatically that there is not a skerick of evidence that he did.
To what subject?
I think it's in our nature as human beings to transcend the limits nature imposes on us. Be it(if you're young enough) to stretch you hands if you aspire to be a world class pianist
Perhaps, but it would be a sorry pursuit
The remainder of your argument has appeared to devolve into the prurient or the absurd.