When I look around Youtube and even here for suggestions on repertoire or maybe just small talk about pieces, concerti, and whatnot, I am so appalled by the amount of stuffiness, elitist, and condescending thought that runs high within conversations of this genre. My story goes as such.
I'm not new to the classical scene, however I am new online to discussing it. After being the only one in my friends group interested in classical music, and having literally nobody in person to have good fruitful/nice discussions about piano music, I turned to the internet to listen to pieces, and discuss favorites, practice techniques, and whatnot. But upon looking through tons of comments on videos and conversations in forums, I was in complete surprise at all the hating, envy, and sheer "one-up"-ing going on in these.
What hurt me the most was the bashing of young children playing highly virtuosic pieces by people who are obviously either jealous or highly conservative about the practice of classical. I mean come on? Is there ANY rule that a technically talented child SHOULDN'T attempt Chopin Etudes or something? I don't get why people get all riled up and jump on the hate bandwagon and say that they shouldn't be playing the song because "they don't have the emotion" or some type of highly conservative hokey like that. They're honestly just hurting the new generation of classical lovers from growing and thriving. Seriously, a damn youtube video IS NOT THE INTERNATIONAL CHOPIN COMPETITION.
The condescension towards amateurs truly hinders the appreciation of this wonderful genre. I say that even if there is a hobbyist or amateur who hasn't practiced scales, run through the bach inventions/fugues, or hasn't had formal training, but is insistent on learning a Transcendental Etude, then they should be supported and mentored, not bashed for trying to do so. So what if it is out of their supposed technical level? If they want to work and practice through it, they should commended for trying, not criticized.
Also, I don't appreciate it when people compare classical to more modern/mainstream genres and call the latter trash. They are two completely different views of musical thought and SHOULD be appreciated for their contributions to our culture. In the end of the day, both are music, and should be appreciated for what they are, rather than what they are not.
As someone who is truly in love with the piano and the classical genre, I don't want this genre to ever fade; rather more I want it to grow back to somewhat of what it used to be, if not as significant as it was in the early 20th century. But keeping these highly competitive and critical views isn't helping: not all of us are competing in competitions, heck i'm sure most of the classical fan-base are hobbyists (myself included). With the rise of new hybrid acts like the "Yellow Lounge" and the new wave of virtuoso pianists (like Yuja Wang, Alice Sara Ott, Benjamin Grosvenor, Yundi Li, Lang Lang...etc), I'm excited to see where this genre will go in the coming decade. I feel as if the fan-base were to be more open and willing for people to learn about the genre, and allow it to seep through to the mainstream without it seeming like some holy artifact has become tainted, I feel like it can go places and achieve its former glory, rather than die the slow death that it is seemingly going through.
Long live the classical genre and long live the piano. I will keep fighting for this genre and instrument to be an important cornerstone of our society no matter what; and I hope you will do the same.
