its pretty disappointing though, a clear "must record all works" - not a "will record all works, assuming that I can give a polished interpretation of all works"
Reminds me of the Leslie Howard Liszt set.
yes - I've got part of that on my phone at the moment. I felt quite depressed by trans etude no 4, it seemed like the performance wasn't even technically up to it in places (and I don't mean like small problems, more like really struggling), let alone musical on top of that.
I also have his recording of the Tschaikovsky Sonata. Just imagine how crap that must be. Multiply by 7!
Try composing the equivalent of ALL of his/her works!
If we are talking about a quantity figure here, rather than me composing at the same quality (subjective anyway) - Then this would be phenomenally easier than learning someone else's, as it would for anyone who can improvise fluently.
On one listening to a performance of Albinoni's Miserere he went home and transcribed it, allegedly note perfect. Surely that would have been easier than actually having to come up with a few ideas (though given his phenomenal output, he didn't have too much trouble with that either).
I think the composer that is most worth learning while at the same time easy to accomplish would be Ravel. All his solo piano pieces are wonderful, and the good thing is there arnt many.