Are you saying that you are primarily drawn to a piece because of its perceived technical challenge? as opposed to its musical value?
can't possibly explain this very well in a forum post etc. etc.
3 that I've already learned, I will waste no more time trying to learn anymore.Revolutionary- up to speed, but I hate that I absolutely CANNOT get 100% accuracy every time I attempt to play it, always half a dozen or so mistakes.Ocean- Close-ish to final speed, needs more practice. Also the non-arpeggio sections have this melody I never attempted to bring out.Cello- Not really technically difficult relative to other Chopin Etudes, but musically yes. Need to work on phrasing and evenness, and not overpowering the actual melody.
Actually thought you did a pretty good job. Agree wholeheartedly, of course.
Rev etude finished? SO baller! Man I have been working on that one and abandoning it for some time now. Allow me to ask. Do you use the advised fingering on left hand? How did you practice this one?Thanks!
So basically three that you have more or less learnt the notes for, and nothing else? I agree it would be a waste of time for you to "learn" any more like this, you still have plenty of work to do in these 3.
Hey now, I didn't just mechanically learn those three. I actually attempted to phrase (although quite miserably) the piece, and spent a good amount of time on interpretation.I think part of the reason why I'm so obsessed with technique is that virtuosity is required to fully express yourself in the piano repertory.
Technique is certainly necessary to fully express yourself, but you need to have something to say to make the exercise worthwhile.