Piano Forum

Topic: Debussy's Sunken Cathedral: Composer's intention or "standard" convention?  (Read 9215 times)

Offline pianoplayer1224

  • PS Silver Member
  • Newbie
  • ***
  • Posts: 16
In Debussy’s Sunken Cathedral, the Dover edition indicates that the time signature is 6/4=3/2 and has a footnote indicating that measures 7-12 and 22-83 were played in double time on Debussy’s own piano roll recording.
Interestingly though, other editions such as the esteemed Durand do not have this indication. Similarly, a number of pianist renowned for their Debussy interpretations do not play those measures in double time. 
Personally, I prefer playing the passages in double time as otherwise I find that the tempo seems to drag. However I am questioning this as I am wondering for an examination or audition what would be more appropriate; to follow the composer’s own intentions or the supposedly standard convention?
I would be glad to hear any opinions on this.

Offline lukediv

  • PS Silver Member
  • Jr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 88
hi,

I played this piece for a competition and my exam last year. i also have the dover edition which says to play the part we are talking about in double time. on both those occasions nothing was said to me regarding the appropriateness of playing those bars in double time and i ended up doing pretty good in both so it must be ok to do so:)

hope that helps.

Offline pianoplayer1224

  • PS Silver Member
  • Newbie
  • ***
  • Posts: 16
Thanks a lot.
Does anyone with a different edition have another opinion or thought about this? I would love to hear from you.

Offline le_poete_mourant

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 382
This is why I'm glad we have no recordings of Beethoven playing the piano... Just because Debussy did this in his recording doesn't mean it is right or wrong. It may work fine for you or it may not. Perhaps there are other ways to explore moving the pace forwards a little bit without going all the way to double time. I notice that in measure 22 there is the note "Augmentez progressivement (sans presser)"  -- to me this would indicate to move move forwards but not too much and I think that note might run contrary to the idea of double timing it. Ultimately it's what works for you as a musician, and if your ear thinks it work, go with it I guess.

Offline thorn

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 784
I think you should do what works best for you. If you don't like the way Debussy plays it, find another way. If you like bits, merge them in.

I have the Debussy plays Debussy and in the sleeve notes it suggests that Debussy was only pleased with how La soiree dans Grenade and La danse de Puck turned out. Also, he may have sped parts up to that extent because he was aware of the limited recording time available in those early days.

To be honest, it's always a treat to hear a composer play their own works, but I personally wouldn't rely too heavily on them in my own interpretations.

Like I said though, it's your call. The key is to do whatever you choose with conviction and confidence so they know that agree or disagree, you are playing it exactly how you mean to.
For more information about this topic, click search below!

Piano Street Magazine:
Enfant Terrible or Childishly Innocent? – Prokofiev’s Complete Piano Works Now on Piano Street

In our ongoing quest to provide you with a complete library of classical piano sheet music, the works of Sergey Prokofiev have been our most recent focus. As one of the most distinctive and original musical voices from the first half of the 20th century, Prokofiev has an obvious spot on the list of top piano composers. Welcome to the intense, humorous, and lyrical universe of his complete Sonatas, Concertos, character pieces, and transcriptions! Read more
 

Logo light pianostreet.com - the website for classical pianists, piano teachers, students and piano music enthusiasts.

Subscribe for unlimited access

Sign up

Follow us

Piano Street Digicert