Best one I've found.. granted I didn't look too hard, or try to make one myself......well I laughed. - Because I hated writing in 4 part vocal style when I was 12 and I felt a little bit like my teacher might have done this when marking my theory.
me: What note does is say on the score?student: "F#"me: great, so what note are you playing?student: oh.
Genius's and their successes..
Oh come on, Wolfie was 8 before he wrote his first symphony - this kid is just a try hard!
oh Arnie....you'll never change
All of you know this is true!
Ok.Now somebody post one that's actually funny.
One might learn how to spell "accommodate" before presuming the ability to do so.
One might also use unpretentious syntax more common in the 20th and 21st centuries when talking. Also, he "presumed" his inability to do so, not his ability to do so.
One might take note of the dialect of the post to which I was responding, in conjunction with acquainting oneself with the correct definition of "syntax."
This, of course, so as to avoid its misuse in any additional run-on sentences, particularly ones which erroneously contain the phrase "common in," as opposed to the correct "common to."
All of that regardless of the fact that the refusal to accommodate does not imply the inability to do so.
As an exercise in futility, perhaps you could try to find a way to be even more thoroughly wrong in your response.
Yay this thread already turned into some dude complaining about grammar. Whoo!
This is what happened to me last week. I was soooo freaking mad!!!
Also, he "presumed" his inability to do so, not his ability to do so.
That aside, apologies about some of my pictures not appearing in the thread any more, no idea why the links are breaking - something to do with memecreator.org I think.
"I don't always post multiple lots negativity in a PS thread, but when I do, I find its a positive experience"
The post you were responding to used common syntax. "One does not" could be replaced by "A person does not", but both are common.
One might also use unpretentious syntax more common in the 20th and 21st centuries when talking.
And perhaps you should look up the definition of syntax, since I used the word correctly. Dialect is a combination of syntax and diction.
Either way, "One might..." is not an opening to a sentence used by anyone who lives in the 21st century (and recognizes that fact).
My sentence is not a run-on.
I think the term you're looking for is sentence fragment, but it's not that either.
"Common in" works just as well as "common to" in this case.
Sentence fragment
Also, the image implies he is unable to by referencing the Fellowship's inability to just walk into Mordor (definitely not their refusal).
Why have you capitalized "A"? Also, why do you have a comma outside of a quotation mark? If the post I was responding to had "common syntax," whatever you think that means, then please explain why you posted this, in response to me:
If the post I was responding to had "common syntax," whatever you think that means, then please explain why you posted this, in response to me:Or are you referring to the second line, then? Because there is absolutely nothing incorrect about the second line, nor does it sound dated. It is, simply, somewhat technical, hence your apparent unfamiliarity with the construction. However, using the royal we/one is very outdated; I guess I gave you too much credit. Silly me, assuming you knew what you were talking about. I definitely won't ever make that mistake again.
Actually, you didn't use the word correctly. I'd tell you to look it up, but I assume that you already have, and simply failed to understand the nuance of the word. Do you even know what "grammar" actually means?http://learn-language-online.com/language-parts-of-speech/grammar-and-syntaxhttp://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_difference_between_dialect_and_diction
Oh, so it was "one might" that you were referring to! In which case, your argument is that "one does" is an acceptable and contemporary construction, whereas "one might" is not. Do you realize how stupid that is (you probably don't)? What about "one might do"? Please explain to me why "one does" and "one might" are so different to you.
Let's check:Hey look, it's a run-on after all.
Let's add "run-on" and "sentence fragment" to the list of linguistic terms you don't know the definitions of.
Oh look, another run-on sentence. And you are wrong; what are we "in"?
"Sentence fragment" is a sentence fragment. And where is your punctuation? By the way,
Hey look, it's not a sentence fragment after all. What a shock: You're wrong again. Who would have believed it?
Your run-on sentence implies that you don't learn. Unable to what? I do not care about any extra-contextual intension vis-a-vis the Tolkien books; I am only referring to the intention. You do know the difference between intension and intention, correct?
Composer Memes (Read 32278 times)
