Home
Piano Music
Piano Music Library
Top composers »
Bach
Beethoven
Brahms
Chopin
Debussy
Grieg
Haydn
Mendelssohn
Mozart
Liszt
Prokofiev
Rachmaninoff
Ravel
Schubert
Schumann
Scriabin
All composers »
All composers
All pieces
Search pieces
Recommended Pieces
Audiovisual Study Tool
Instructive Editions
Recordings
PS Editions
Recent additions
Free piano sheet music
News & Articles
PS Magazine
News flash
New albums
Livestreams
Article index
Piano Forum
Resources
Music dictionary
E-books
Manuscripts
Links
Mobile
About
About PS
Help & FAQ
Contact
Forum rules
Pricing
Log in
Sign up
Piano Forum
Home
Help
Search
Piano Forum
»
Piano Board
»
Repertoire
»
Goodyear's hammerklavier fugue - does the fugue deserve its praise?
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Topic: Goodyear's hammerklavier fugue - does the fugue deserve its praise?
(Read 2065 times)
emrysmerlin
PS Silver Member
Full Member
Posts: 119
Goodyear's hammerklavier fugue - does the fugue deserve its praise?
on: August 01, 2012, 10:06:18 AM
Hi,
I'm new to this forum. I am a huge admirer of Alkan and Beethoven (referring to piano music). I also like music by Bach, Busoni, Mozart, Chopin and Liszt. I just want to start off by getting people's attention to this particular recording of the fugue of Beethoven's hammerklavier. The fugue, played at a tempo almost close to Beethoven's suggested one, if one would notice, sounds very empty at most times, and whenever motive C begins, the piece sounds exceptionally empty. The transitions sound almost sickening to me, and the ending sounded...incomplete. If this is what the hammerklavier would've really sounded like (intended, almost), does the fugue really deserve its acclaim? (I do recall Horowitz making some comments on the tempo one should play the hammerklavier on.)
[Edit: apparently the youtube icon doesn't work as well as I have expected]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgZ8z7Ztn10
Logged
Sign-up to post reply
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up