1. Because he is a competitor and so am I. He (the student) wishes to compete and I support it 100%.
I didn't mean to suggest I thought it was a bad idea, my apologies if it came across that way. Just curious of the reasons for competing and how they may effect the repertoire choice.
3. This remains to be seen. However, it has been my experience, that the judges in this area focus largely on clarity and technique. Musicianship is a close second. If a student plays a Mozart Sonata, I have a feeling the judges are thinking (1 e + a 2 e + a 3 e + a 4 e ... AHAH! he was off)
I wonder how soon that information would become available? As I said, this kind of stuff isn't at all my within my field of knowledge.. and this is specifically why, I dislike tailoring an interpretation to serve someone else's personal view on how music should be played.
that said, my experience in the area is that growing up my teacher entered me in an annual regional eisteddfod (reasonable size, the event lasted a full week of performing from 9am-10pm)
My teacher was on the organizing committee, she always knew who would be adjudicating and often had copies of notes an adjudicator had made on her other students in earlier years, and sometimes on the specific piece I was performing in the event.. needless to say this was an advantage.
We even rehearsed with concern toward the specific piano that would be used. The concert halls Steinway B was a different animal to the Yamaha U3 my teacher owned, and of course very different to the older dilapidated instrument I had at home.
We also did rehearsals on the piano at the hall, during the preceding weeks you could book in a practice session for $40/hour if the hall was not in high demand for any other events.
4. This is a good idea. I'll have to try to see what I can dig up. This would probably be helpful.
It would have to be cross referenced against the judge in any given year, hopefully that will be available also.
**Apologies for dragging the conversation away from actual repertoire.