Carl Tausig.
Stanchinsky.
Alban Berg. Maybe he would have set a better example than Schoenberg to the academic serialists that infested almost the rest of the century that 12-tone composing can be incredible music.
Chopin!!! Actually from op.9 to the end, his works are all amazing. 39 years, too young for death...Mozart!!! Latest works are magical... Requiem is a grand final. 35 years, too young for death...
Krappyhorshoe Snorabji
I can't quite believe that more than a score of posts have already been made to this thread with no mention yet of Mahler
or Tchaikovsky!
Hans Rott. Dmitri Shostakovich.
JS Bach!! Only reached 65. Imagine what he might have written when he had lived as long as Telemann! Or else I would settle for the turning up of all the works now lost. The other 10-15 violin concerto's might be nice to hear, or the other 100+ cantatas (not to mention the 'worldy' ones)...*sigh*All best,gep
I'd be interested to see other people's opinions--which composers seemed to be just on the cusp of something, and which ones, even if they had untimely deaths, seemed to reach a maximum of expression which would be both difficult to sustain and to further develop?
Hey has anyone said Mozart or Chopin yet? -Schubert obviously. Not so much for the fact that I wanted more music from him, but for the fact that I wish he tasted a bit of success from his hard work.-I would have loved to have seen Rachmaninoff live a bit longer. Not that he died young its just that film and audio was developing and I would have loved to have seen some live recordings of him.-Alexei Stanchinsky. He suffered from mental problems and died most likely from suicide at 26. If he had lived longer, we probably would be as comfortable with his name as we are with Scriabin, Rachmaninoff and Prokofiev.
How come all the good composers are crazy?!
I wish that JS Bach had lived long enough to see the piano come into its own, and to compose specifically for the piano. Another couple of decades would have done it. I also wish that Mussorgsky had written more, for which he would have had to get sober. --s.
...not to forget Schumann
Thanks for your responses. There are several composers I haven't heard before, which will make for some interesting searching.Since Peter Warlock was mentioned, I should mention Gesualdo, whose last two (complete) books of madrigals fascinate me. Given the 'new' fashion of monodic song coming into vogue towards his later years and that his only catalogued 'aria' is no longer extant, I would be intrigued to see how he would treat a single voice, if he could distill the intensity of some of his ensemble works to a single voice. There is one work for keyboard attributed to him, but I also wonder what this music would have become, were he given more time in the genre--especially,since he played it, pieces written for the archicembalo, which was capable of microtonal intervals.
Excellent, I never thought Schobert would get a mention on this forum.Thal
George Gershwin. A great American composer whose classical pieces I hope by this point don't need any defense. A lot of terrific stuff for piano, for orchestra, and Porgy and Bess is still the greatest American opera. He died not only young but unexpectedly. Who knows what he could have done if he had lived -- at the time of his death he was working on a string quartet.
Another composer who died very young is the American Louis Moreau Gottschalk.I once listened to some of his thoughts played on an antique square piano and it sounded very beautiful.
Indeed - having only just financed in full the world première recording of the fourth string quartet by his friend Schönberg.Best,Alistair
I once went to a concert at Finchcocks Piano Museum here in Kent/England and Richard Burnett the owner, played Gottschalk on a piano the composer was likely to have used. I was surprised at the quality of the sound.Thal