Thank God, or it really would be the end of the world as we know it.
It sometimes happens. We both like Bloch and Bowen.
and that one is sadly old enough to remember the days when only a very few of his works were regularly performed
I have heard that with age comes wisdom.
Come on now, you know she does a pretty kickass job.
All the other first cadenzas suck.With the exception of maybe Rachmaninoff himself.Let me see you post something better.
Earl Wild recorded a stunning 3rd.Thal
She "played" a couple of Rach Preludes on Radio 3 yesterday and it was horrific. Almost too much to listen to.
I didn't hear them; fortuitously, it might seem.
However horrific the sound she produced, it was nowhere near as bad as Szymanowski's Second String Quartet that is polluting Radio 3 as I type.
I didn't hear them; fortuitously, it might seem. She seems quite remarkably ill-suited to Rachmaninov yet one can only assume that she's unaware of this fact. Again, I simply cannot figure out what all the fuss is supposed to be about.Best,Alistair
Which ensemble was evidently ruining that lovely work?
Omg exactly. She is too young! She still has soo much work to do.
The best ensemble in the World could play it, or a group of rampant chimps.
There would be precious little difference in the sound.
She's in her 40s already, so she's not that young!
Compared to you she is.
Member chopin2015
She is too young! She still has soo much work to do.
God knows where that leaves me.. no doubt any rendition of rachmaninoff I manage to produce will be down right abhorrent.I like her Rach 3 anyway. People get stuck in there heads what they expect to hear.. they also seem to have an innate desire to tear shreds of anyone who achieves some level of public success. Really, if someone here posted identical performance to her solo videos in the audition room it would be VERY well received.. or in the event that someone offered musical advice, it would be done very politely.. the word "horrific" would not be used.
Its just her musical ideas dont speak like they do on vinyl. Does she have a record on vinyl? I dunno.
You will do fine. Id like to hear a manlier version of rach 3, please, ajspiano. Thats all. Teehee
That's not a problem that's unique to her.if I remember rightly something I read, they used to think its was a "men's concerto" that was too physically demanding for a woman..
I just dont think her music is such a novelty. Compare the 1940s when only a certain type of people got to go to concerts. Now anything gets by! Well...not everything.
She planned everything out and she possibly feels that the stage is not the place to experiment and improvise
Different time. I read that when Metallica recorded S & M a large percentage of the audience left almost immediately, either because they couldnt stomach Metallica when they were expecting classical music, or because the actual Metallica fans freaked them out.I doubt she's been around long enough (as a known performer) to get away with taking too many risks whether on stage or in a recording.
if I remember rightly something I read, they used to think its was a "men's concerto" that was too physically demanding for a woman..
So much for "they". Presumably, then, Martha Argerich is not a woman. That's news to me.Best,Alistair
Oh i like her Beethoven recordings...she plays so lightly though
OK, but I referred to he here because of her recording of Rachmaninov's Third Concerto!Best,Alistair
You know, I hate her prokofiev(although I respect her style and speed), and i hate her ondine(she didnt bring out this beautiful sad melody that I heard someone unknown play with such soul, its only like 10 seconds of the whole thing, but it's what is missing!) But i have not listened to her Rach 3. Although I am sure it is good, because she actually does have good musical ideas, otherwise! Can you post a link?
Terrible reproduction, for which I humbly apologise and hope that you'll not be unduly discouraged by it - but here it is, at .Best,Alistair