That 3rd movement, to me, is love itself. I think I'd really rather play the cello for that one! I've played the QUINTET in Eb plenty of times-another of Schumann's finest compositions!
For challenge, excitement, intellectual rigour, drama, lyricism, structural control, harmonic and melodic richness and sheer expressive power, why not try out the utterly compelling Piano Quintet in B minor, Op. 51 (1901-08) by Florent Schmitt (1870-1958)? - one of the greatest works in the medium ever composed, in my view, though all too rarely programmed.Best,Alistair
Trios are the neglected side of my chamber music experience.
I played the Beethoven C minor, Op. 1, no 3 recently, too. Great piece. Did you gliss the C major descending scale in the Scherzo?For myself, trio-wise, the three works of Brahms, esp. the B Major, rise like 8000 meter peaks.Also Schubert Op. 99 and 100... Mozart E Major... Archduke... Ghost... Ach. So much great literature, and those are just the well known ones. Trios are so much easier to put together logistics-wise than quartets or quintets, and the cello and violin balance with the piano so well.
That is a fine work...and a handful to learn. We have the score to some of his trio miniatures, in addition to the quartet, and may try them first. Also the first trio, the Phantasie Trio, composed in his youth, is beautiful. I can't find a you-tube version of the second, but here's seven minutes of the last movt. of the Phantasie, played by a virtuosic group at a Vermont summer festival. Some scholars call Bridge the "bridge" between the 19th and 20th centuries...not a bad appellation.
Faure is under-rated...!