Starch is a carb.If we avoided all the things we weren't supposed to eat, we'd starve. And life would be rather dull.
Sugar is bad.Carbs turns turn into sugar, so carbs are bad.Starch is a complex carb and eventually turns into sugar. It just takes longer. So is it bad?And I saw "some guy" on a TED talk saying how miraculous starch is. If everyone only ate starch all their health issues would go away.
Sugar be bad.There. Corrected. For the non-English speakers.English is a complex and confusing language. Easy for even native speakers to get confused once in a while. I was being informal above, using 'sugar is bad.' Sugar be bad is more grammatically correct and formal. Sometimes you hear this formal nature in urban areas or in the southern portion of the United States. Children also have a natural grasp of it, but it gets lost as they grow up and get corrupted in the word. The short reasoning for the use of be vs. is -- Bees buzz. Bees tend honey which is sugar. Therefore, be. It's hard to argue with logic like that. If it doesn't make sense, don't worry. Just stick with is. It's idiomatic. Hope that helps.I won't even go into why it's bad instead of well. Sugar is inherently evil in this sentence, actually representing, incarnating evilnessness.