It's old-school technique.Anyone who does exactly that will run into issues so I advise against it.[/quoteWhat kind of issues?What do you mean with old fingerschool?Never heard about a Levinne student with "issues"....you?Please elaborate.
In Josef Lhevinne's book, Basic Principles In Pianoforte Playing, he says that he directs his students to play moving their fingers only at the first joint. In other words, the only joint that moves is the one connecting the finger to the hand. The finger is still held curved a bit. Does anyone know why one should play this way?Thanks in advance!
Old-school technique: believed piano-playing was a finger activity so it's best to utilize fingers effectively. The strength of the fingers was determined by the "arch". This is the premise of how to make fingers strong and effective.However, if you maximized efficiency of movement, you'll involve movement at all joints of the fingers since it minimizes relying solely on the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint, the joint in question here. The fingers are not levers; they are an extension of the forearm with the angle of attack modified by forearm rotation and wrist movement. This is a more complex way of thinking about depressing the keys but it's more efficient and effective instead of relying solely on the movement of one joint.
Your explanation is well known and the hints to the Taubman approach are evident.
But calling Lhevinne an exponent of the "old finger school" is not correct.I tell you..Russian know what they're doing...but they dont tell you everything they know..
.... Umm.... I don't even do Taubman.And so this is the reason this thread was started.
... he directs his students to play moving their fingers only at the first joint. In other words, the only joint that moves is the one connecting the finger to the hand. The finger is still held curved a bit. Does anyone know why one should play this way?