I have been trained in scientific methodology and philosophy. Because of that I can critically assess and compare both theories and research findings in a way that most people cannot. Laymen tend to try to apply them into reality in a way that is not consistent with the science. That is also very common with statistics.
I see so many misconceptions/misinterpretations in your posts that it would simply be too much work and require too many words to try to correct them. You have taken some theories and bits and pieces from research findings and statistics and tried to use them to support your preconceived ideas in a way that simply does not make any sense to someone with my background. I don't know if you do it on purpose or if you are not aware of it.
Your use of evolution theory is especially creative. In addition to having some basic understanding of the evolution theory and its limitations I have quite a lot of practical experience in working with genetic variation and reproduction behavior in more than one species. I just find your posts too much of a mess to continue a decent discussion. Sorry.
Given that you've spent all of your posts trying to rubbish what I've said, refusing to make accountable points and instead trying to build your status is a pretty cheap way to bow out. Appeal to authority is a very weak argument - especially when you make yourself the authority and refuse to deal with anything that is on the table.
Female sexuality has been downplayed over the years, but the fact that people are learning more about how it acts does not lead to the conclusion that men and women are not different in their requirements. Iold fashioned views are moving on, but they were an EXAGGERATION of reality. Not an outright myth. Neither observation in the real world nor ANY credible science backs up such utter nonsense as the idea that we behave the same.
Go and research some modern science about sociology and the different evolution of male and female minds. Female preselection is the most interesting. I bet you haven't researched it at all. There is abundant evidence that women find a man more attractive than HIMSELF, if he is pictured with beautiful women smiling at him. Conversely men do not judge a woman positively on success with attractive men. Both are jealous in the right context. But a woman is attracted because of jealousy issues. Whereas a man will simply be jealous of someone who has something he wants.
I've seen this me after time in practice, since learning about. It's not some twist of fate that men in relationships get more offers than when the same person is single. It's because of a well proven difference between male and female sexuality. Women are also more likely to sleep with a man more quickly in this situation, as it's like a seal of approval. A man who starts alone attracts more suspicion, even if attractive in other ways and has to put in more mental preparation before the woman would allow her defences down. But merely enter a bar with a group of attractive women who look at you with desire, and other women in the room have already begun letting their defences down without a word spoken. Women essentially trust the opinions of other women, in a subconscious level that contributes to attraction.
The differences are plenty and I suggest you investigate more sources before correcting me. You might also explore the considerable evidence that women with unusually high testosterone levels tends to have more sex drive and that men with higher oestrogen levels often have less. And then no doubt you'll come back an list a few more minor credentials - as if that makes a few assertions of fact from you, minus supporting evidence, more important than floods of modern sociological research.
Topic: Do pianists have more/better sex?