No, that's the joint probability of man and bigoted, p(y,x). To get p(y|x) you need to divide by the marginal probability of x, p(x).
Quotenah. think about it in your head. Say that the probability of an animal being a fox is .01 = P(B). SAy that the probability of fox being orange is 0.3 P(A|B)AHHJH!!!!! NO!!!! That's the probability that the animal is orange GIVEN that the animal in question is a fox. That is something different than the probability that the animal is a fox given that it is orange. DUDE, the relationship is given by Bayes' Rule. I didn't come up with it or axiomatize probability theory.
nah. think about it in your head. Say that the probability of an animal being a fox is .01 = P(B). SAy that the probability of fox being orange is 0.3 P(A|B)
YOU ARE A STUPID IDIOT. YES, P(man|bigoted) =0.5 BUT WHERE IN THAT *** INFORMATION DID YOU SPECIFY THE MARGINAL PROBABILITY OF THE COMMENTER BEING A MAN?
All your arguments about the wrong formula are idiotc because if you take the expressioj literally, P(B)=1 then the expression is utterly useless and trivial: P(a)=P(a). This is the only sensible interpretation of the equation with the typo, idiot.
.
Am i missing out on something?
First, I'd like to point out that my first post listed the possible ways to fix imbalance, not recommended courses of action. Men seem to be more than satisfied with being the slave of their hypothalamus, and trying to change them forcibly is a meaningless effort. Sure, things like castration (and the plethora of other things I listed) are ways to fix people, but most people don't want to be fixed.Most of your post is largely pointless, all things considered. You claim it is a necessity for a man to have a sex drive, yet I (among many others) am a testament to the opposite. Personally, I'm not a huge fan of having my mind addled and given orders by an incredibly primitive and largely useless part of my brain. You claim it is healthy, I've observed absolute evidence to the opposite. And, considering I'm very well aware that you can easily turn on and off your ability to be attracted to people, I realize that men are in fact pigs, because like an animal, they decide of their own volition not to exercise any restraint or self-control. I can't very well side with people who don't give the slightest effort to control themselves, can I?
You just don't get it.If all of us guys cut our balls off, every single women in the world (excepting gays) would be crying because no one would be able to fertilize their helpless little eggs.It sounds funny to joke about now, but believe me, most women need certain things, and sex is one of them.But aside from that, WHO THE HELL ARE YOU TO TELL US WHAT WE SHOULD OR SHOULD NOT BE?!Males have always been the dominant sex. Women were practically created to please them.It's always been that way, and it always will be.
I will say this for probably the sixth time: I am NOT recommending it, or wanting it to happen. All I can say is that men do a piss poor job at dominance, and it is an ill-suited and backward role for the gender.
in the good old days, men were gentlemen,
It wasn't always like that.In todays messed up generation, there are a lot of stupid men who don't do their jobs. But in the good old days, men were gentlemen, and they did their job of protecting and working much better.
You really don't know much history, do you.
No, it's just that people ended up realizing gender roles were idiotic swill of antiquity.
How old are you? I'm talking like 1800's dude.Of course there were still some idiots back then (like you), but not as many as today.Do me a favor, when someone posts a reply, try to get the point of what they're saying instead of nitpicking over the fine details.
Gender roles are (should be) still in place. You can bs as much as you want, but fact is, WOMEN WILL NEVER BE MEN AND MEN WILL NEVER BE WOMEN. Women are entitled to education and working for themselves if they want, there's nothing wrong with that. Where the problem starts is when a women has two kids and then sends them to daycare all day because she selfishly doesn't want to give up her career to fulfill her most important duty in life. Men are SUPPOSED to be the ones to keep working and provide for their families so that the women can stay with the children at least until they're old enough to go to school, but sometimes the men are jerks, and don't try to provide, forcing the women to leave the kids and work. This is where the quality of most men has deteriorated.Objecting to this kind of logic, my friends, is idiotic.
Women are oppressed and don't get the chance to become good bigots. Although with modern culture, equal rights.... Shouldn't we be seeing more female bigots? Or an equal distribution of bigots among all backgrounds?
If all of us guys cut our balls off, every single women in the world (excepting gays) would be crying because no one would be able to fertilize their helpless little eggs.
You can bs as much as you want, but fact is, WOMEN WILL NEVER BE MEN AND MEN WILL NEVER BE WOMEN.
I'm sorry to disappoint you:"The number of gender reassignment surgeries carried yearly on the NHS has tripled since 2000, figures show. In 2000, 54 surgeries were carried out, compared with 143 in 2009, the Daily Telegraph reports. Since 2000, a total of 853 trans women and 12 trans men had state-funded surgery to change sex."Source: http://www.bournemouth.gov.uk/PeopleLiving/BournemouthStatistics/Bournemouth-JSNA/Reports/Community-profiles/GenderReassignment.pdf
True, but you can't forget that "sex change" surgeries actually don't change sex, because you remain the same biological sex on a cellular level.
Ever heard of hermaphrodites? There's no such thing as fixed cellular level sex...People can have all kinds of chomosome combinations. Sex is a basicly a combination of basic biological structures and hormones at work. Gender is much more.
I'm aware of what hermaphrodites are. Yes, they are both sexes, but they also have cellular representation of such. As for polysomial conditions, the biological representation of these in humanity is very small, and even then, it's hard-wired, and not a sudden onset matter. There are indeed disorders that make you a sex neither purely male or female, but these are present from birth, and no procedure can produce their cellular form."Gender", as it is modernly defined, is, frankly, a load of wish-fulfillment bollocks. It's the concept that someone's opinion actually means jack squat in terms of influencing veracity. It is but a desperate grab at control where none exists, so people can feel less like pathetic and helpless waifs.
WOMEN WILL NEVER BE MEN AND MEN WILL NEVER BE WOMEN.
Whether present from birth or not shouldn't really make a difference for the original question. Also ignoring the effect of hormones in humans I can only see as ignorance. What your biology teacher taught you was a very simplified and incomplete picture of nature
Hormone have their effects, sure. But hormones don't change everything.
No, it's a complex system. They do change a lot (ask anyone who has been through extreme hormone therapy). When it comes to sex the perceived charasteristics and differences are statistical and depending on definitions and classifications. They work rather well with majorities. Which makes the whole discussion rather pointless, since it's about extreme behavior
There was this policeman in my town who had his knob cut off or something, to become a woman.He was lovingly known as PCACDC.Thal
You'd be surprised:http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/stories/s327396.htmAlready in 2001 the scientists figured pout how to fertilize eggs without sperm. It's just a matter of time...
Contrary to rumour, the 1800s predate me.My point, which you appear too thick to have ascertained, is that you are nostalgic for a past which exists only in your febrile imagination, and which bears no relationship to the past that actually was. If you are going to quote history a precedent for your preferred position, it is incumbent upon you to ensure that that history actually happened. That seems a fundamental flaw, not a "nitpicking over the fine details".
Women are entitled to education and working for themselves if they want, there's nothing wrong with that. Where the problem starts is when a women has two kids and then sends them to daycare all day because she selfishly doesn't want to give up her career to fulfill her most important duty in life. Men are SUPPOSED to be the ones to keep working and provide for their families so that the women can stay with the children at least until they're old enough to go to school, but sometimes the men are jerks, and don't try to provide, forcing the women to leave the kids and work. This is where the quality of most men has deteriorated.Objecting to this kind of logic, my friends, is idiotic.
Besides, most people don't do it for children, most people just want the "romance."
It's no secret my friend, that they're are A LOT more idiots (men idiots and women idiots) today then there were back then.
By the way, I never heard any rumors about you being older than the 1800's. In fact, I've heard a lot of rumors that you're more like a 25 year old punk.
Having you external appearance modified does not make you a different sex.Men can grow boobs and women can mutilate themselves, but THAT DOESN'T MAKE THEM MEN!
Why are the rudest, most bigoted comments on this forum always made by men? (Read 8502 times)
