...what is the point of "saving" this world and the human race from its own destruction at a particular point in time, or within a particular type of circumstantial living?I am speaking strictly logics.
Kakeithewolf, you are such a happy and positive person!
Why, thank you. I will treasure that compliment.
Wanna have tea and share thoughts on existential nihilism sometime?Best,Alex
I'm not a nihilist, merely a realist.
Neither am I, but is that a no?
Sharing thoughts about Nihilism over tea? Why bother? What's the point?
It's all pointless. There is no point, no meaning.
The Emo's Guide to the Galaxy.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nihilismMy comment was meant as a joke. Meet for tea to discuss Nihilism? What's the point?
Ah, yes. I wasn't reading who was posting. Nevermind....
You know that light at the end of the tunnel people see when they die? Thats a vagina/C-section. What if they come back? Stillborn babies...No pointEverything is irrelevantNothing is truth
Maybe instead of relaying on “hearsay”, you could just start with “looking” for one part in You that does not change - as it is the “door” to finding out for oneself, what is Truth. Can other people’s experience be a proof to you? Not for me. I take something as probable and prove it for myself - in me - as this is only “place” where I can really prove something for myself.
Can one really trust one's own thoughts and conclusions enough to determine what Truth is "?
What about the element of our responsibility for and towards nature, other living beings, etc?
That question arises only because you are separated. You have ideas about nature. You see the damage that humans inflict on nature and You want to be “responsible”, as a reaction to what you observe. Consider those questions then:What is a cause of the damage to nature ? Why you feel the need to be “responsible”? (look for a hint above) In what realm that question arises for You?
Thanks for clarifying that.As for the question in the topic. The tendency to show compassion and "save" others or to ease their pain (not even exclusively our own kind) seems to be inbuilt from the very start, regardless of any knowledge of whether life is eternal or not. On YouTube, for example, there are several amazing clips where animals rescue other animals (not even of their own or closely related species).
I'd favor stretching out the 'now' part of eternal life, esp. if someone made a mistake and this is it.
So, take "Life is eternal." That doesn't say you stay the same or still stay you even. Maybe it's eternal, but you turn into a tree. Maybe you're not even conscious. But still alive and eternal that way. ... That would kind of stuck, being an eternal tree.
What do you mean by that statement? If now is only a part (of eternal life) there has to be whole (of eternal life) of which part is a piece in a puzzle What is whole then? What mistake you have in mind? Can life happen anywhere else but now?Because you take yourself to be a material thing - a body you deduct that in eternity you may become other things, of eternal existence (tree). Are there any things that last in time eternally that you are aware of?
Space-time sounds pretty eternal. I don't think I'd want to be that though.That means if I have any say, I wouldn't mind stretching out the time right now before dying and trying out that eternal stage. I'm not a rush. An extra ten years probably wouldn't be noticed, and that's certainly not a big deal compared to eternity. An extra hundred years then, same idea. I'd still rather not be a tree, esp. a conscious tree. I'd become aware and be thinking, "Oh f____. I'm a tree. Now what?" And then a dog would come along eventually. You know that's going to happen.