but if you are going to accompany someone (or someones!) as you say -- the beat goes on.
I thought I had blown the sight-reading part of my interview, but I still got the job. They gave me a Strauss song that I had never seen before, and told me to accompany one of their best tenors. I was terrified. My hands wouldn't move. I played more wrong notes than I could count. What was it that I had done right that landed me the job and allowed me to play piano for a living?Here's how I overcame my poor sight-reading abilities to land the collaborative pianist job:First, my top priority was making the soloist sound good. I stuck to him like glue. I anticipated and made music out of every dynamic inflection, tempo fluctuation, and catch-breath that he took.Right up there with showcasing the soloist's musicianship is style. If my sight-reading were a solo piece, style would be my top priority. I'd be better off playing all the wrong notes with the right tempo, dynamics, articulations, and tone quality, than if I had played flawless pitches and rhythms without the style.Rhythm is also way more important than pitch when sight reading. The wrong note at the right time is better than the right note at the wrong time. Furthermore, if I had even once disrupted the flow of the piece to fix a mistake, I would have lost the job right then and there. The beat waits for no one. The show must go on.So, in the end, the long years that I had spent working on my sight-reading technique mostly didn't help me. I just made music better than the other candidates. That was just the sight-reading part of the audition, though.