I actually don't much care for Rach 3. It's not a bad concerto, just seems like mostly flash and bang mixed in with a few moments of beautiful melodies. I much prefer the second, which, while it's also largely crash and bang, it seems discernible to my ears. The third just has way too many notes for my taste.The fourth (although I've only listened to it a handful of times) is also an excellent piece of music. I much prefer it over the ever famous 3rd.
Perhaps it's the chromatic LH I don't care much for?
Although, I will be the FIRST to admit that Chopin's Scherzo no.1 is a huge criminal of this. Not so much chromaticism, just too many fking notes.Wouldn't you know, I very much dislike it
The first scherzo is the shortest of all 4. it just repeats itself a lot. It's "long" but there's less content in it than the other 3.
Props to diomedes for picking it up. I've heard it's easier than the other three but never found that to be true when I've played through it (or rather, tried to).Some of the etudes have that quality, to be sure. But all of them (except perhaps 10/2) fit within their respective ideas.
"too many notes" What makes your post even more funny interesting is that you call yourself "Chopinlover" lol...
Out of blatant curiosity, what about my signature shows you that I'm "full of horseshit"?
What you don't like=/= meaning its a bad composition. I think you need to understand that.