Home
Piano Music
Piano Music Library
Audiovisual Study Tool
Search pieces
All composers
Top composers »
Bach
Beethoven
Brahms
Chopin
Debussy
Grieg
Haydn
Mendelssohn
Mozart
Liszt
Prokofiev
Rachmaninoff
Ravel
Schubert
Schumann
Scriabin
All composers »
All pieces
Recommended Pieces
PS Editions
Instructive Editions
Recordings
Recent additions
Free piano sheet music
News & Articles
PS Magazine
News flash
New albums
Livestreams
Article index
Piano Forum
Resources
Music dictionary
E-books
Manuscripts
Links
Mobile
About
About PS
Help & FAQ
Contact
Forum rules
Pricing
Log in
Sign up
Piano Forum
Home
Help
Search
Piano Forum
»
Piano Board
»
Repertoire
»
On the "b" word in diploma programs...
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Topic: On the "b" word in diploma programs...
(Read 1453 times)
thorn
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 808
On the "b" word in diploma programs...
on: June 06, 2015, 02:48:39 PM
Can we talk about this 'balance' thing that crops up when preparing for a diploma?
Ignoring all forum threads and actually reading the Trinity syllabus, you have...
'a minimum of two works...displaying a range of moods, styles and tempi' (p.10)
Then in the marking criteria (p.89), 'Programme, Notes and Presentation Skills' count for 10%.
'Balance' is one of 5 criteria within this 10% (so theoretically counting for 2%).
So why all the pressure for candidates to present repertoire they are not comfortable with?
From a personal perspective I am not strong in Baroque or Classical repertoire at all. Surely a strong performance of Romantic and 20/21 century repertoire that takes a gamble on the 2% balance criteria is better than a half strong-half weak performance of all four periods that secures the 2% balance criteria?
The last two professional recitals I attended have been Debussy-Schumann-Ravel-Stravinsky and the one before that Liszt-Rachmaninoff-Liszt. Both perfectly balanced. Balance is more than the date on the score.
Thoughts?
Logged
rzewskiing
Newbie
Posts: 12
Re: On the "b" word in diploma programs...
Reply #1 on: June 06, 2015, 03:01:59 PM
I don't think there is necessarily pressure in terms of comfort with repertoire. I'm certainly not that comfortable with stuff like Bach and for my ABRSM diploma I decided to go with Brahms G minor Rhapsody, Beethoven's Op. 90 Sonata, Ravel's Sonatine and a March by Khrennikov; never been told it should be more balanced despite only
really
spanning two periods.
I think you're right in that people seem to think that for a program to be 'balanced' it should go Baroque piece, Classical, Romantic then late Romantic/Modern. But I do think you can achieve balance in opting for more comfortable rep and striving for balance within that. I mean if you were to place stuff from Prokofiev's neo-classical period and then do like the war sonata I'm sure it wouldn't sound too samey
Logged
Brahms Rhapsody in G minor
Ravel Sonatine
Beethoven op. 90 Sonata
michael_sayers
Sr. Member
Posts: 1251
Re: On the "b" word in diploma programs...
Reply #2 on: June 06, 2015, 09:04:39 PM
Hi Thorn,
At first I thought you were going to post about Bach, Beethoven and Brahms [the "three 'b's"]!
One thing which I think you may discover is that sometimes music one isn't comfortable with becomes more comfortable and even appealing with the elapse of large spans of time.
Mvh,
Michael
Logged
https://www.michaelsayers.com/
thorn
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 808
Re: On the "b" word in diploma programs...
Reply #3 on: June 06, 2015, 10:16:57 PM
Luckily there are a lot of pianists out there who are comfortable with Bach, Beethoven and Brahms
Logged
Sign-up to post reply
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
For more information about this topic, click search below!
Search on Piano Street