Piano Forum

Topic: Beethoven Op. 27 No. 2  (Read 1328 times)

Offline breakup

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
Beethoven Op. 27 No. 2
on: July 03, 2015, 03:16:48 PM
I noticed that there were a lot of posts about this sonata, and I tried reading as many as I could.   My comment is that I have been playing the 1st movement of this piece for a long time, (over 50 years), but have come to learn that Beethoven never called it the "Moonlight", that happened about 4 years after he died.   My thought was to put that impression out of my mind, and just listen to the music in light of Beethoven's actual title "Sonata quasi una Fantasia", and come to my own conclusions.   In the last few years I have decided that the piece sounds more like a rainstorm than moonlight on a lake.   With that in mind the other movements fit a little better, with the second being some children playing in the wet grass, and the third a really violent storm.   I would be curious to know if anyone else has come to this conclusion, and I'm sorry if I have duplicated a previous post or thread, but I haven't had a lot of time to search the forum. 

Offline cameronbiles

  • PS Silver Member
  • Jr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 72
Re: Beethoven Op. 27 No.
Reply #1 on: July 03, 2015, 05:44:54 PM
I noticed that there were a lot of posts about this sonata, and I tried reading as many as I could.   My comment is that I have been playing the 1st movement of this piece for a long time, (over 50 years), but have come to learn that Beethoven never called it the "Moonlight", that happened about 4 years after he died.   My thought was to put that impression out of my mind, and just listen to the music in light of Beethoven's actual title "Sonata quasi una Fantasia", and come to my own conclusions.   In the last few years I have decided that the piece sounds more like a rainstorm than moonlight on a lake.   With that in mind the other movements fit a little better, with the second being some children playing in the wet grass, and the third a really violent storm.   I would be curious to know if anyone else has come to this conclusion, and I'm sorry if I have duplicated a previous post or thread, but I haven't had a lot of time to search the forum. 

I agree completely with what your saying if memory serves me correctly it was a poet somewhat slightly later who coined it as the moonlight sonata as it inspired a poem he wrote (I presume the poem was called moonlight).However a fantasia or fantasie is a more fitting title for it as it really has no resemblance to moonlight (first movement aside) where if you compare it to much later works like Debussy and Faure who actually title pieces moonlight I'm sure you've heard of one of them....:)
Pieces I'm polishing at the mo:
Debussy reflections on the water (images)
Chopin ballade no.3 op.47
Liszt/Wagner Isolde liebestod

Offline breakup

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
Re: Beethoven Op. 27 No.
Reply #2 on: July 03, 2015, 07:02:24 PM
I agree completely with what your saying if memory serves me correctly it was a poet somewhat slightly later who coined it as the moonlight sonata as it inspired a poem he wrote (I presume the poem was called moonlight).However a fantasia or fantasie is a more fitting title for it as it really has no resemblance to moonlight (first movement aside) where if you compare it to much later works like Debussy and Faure who actually title pieces moonlight I'm sure you've heard of one of them....:)

I hadn't heard the Faure piece before, but I play Debussy's Clare de Lune.   I learned it for 3 reasons, I have always liked the piece and wanted to play it but was intimidated by the way others had recorded it.   My daughter heard it in the one Twilight movie and kept asking me to play it.   Then I heard this version,
  and I thought "I can do that" so I practiced till I had it memorized. 

Offline breakup

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
Re: Beethoven Op. 27 No. 2
Reply #3 on: July 03, 2015, 07:12:34 PM
I would suggest that Claudio Arrau, has done a great service for pianists by demonstrating that pieces do not always need to be played very fast, and sometimes played slowly allows for more expression.    I would say that there are only 2 reasons for playing a piece fast, the piece itself needs to be played fast, or the pianist is trying to show off. 

Offline chopinlover01

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2118
Re: Beethoven Op. 27 No. 2
Reply #4 on: July 03, 2015, 09:03:31 PM
Or they feel that the speed in some parts brings out the music?
Perhaps that may fall under the first category you suggested, but that in and of itself is very abstract and subject to interpretation- as is all music.

Offline sabtan

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: Beethoven Op. 27 No. 2
Reply #5 on: July 03, 2015, 09:05:40 PM
I would suggest that Claudio Arrau, has done a great service for pianists by demonstrating that pieces do not always need to be played very fast, and sometimes played slowly allows for more expression.

I do agree that Claudio Arrau has the best interpretations for Debussy. The video of him playing Reflets dans l'eau on his 80th birthday concert was best ( albeit with a few wrong notes).
Current repertoire:

Haydn Sonata in C maj Hob 50
Bach Toccata and Fugue in G maj
Faure Nocturne no.2 in B maj Op 33
Faure Impromptu no.3 in A major Op 34
Debussy Reflets dans l'eau
For more information about this topic, click search below!

Piano Street Magazine:
From Sacile to Symphony Halls: The Fazioli Phenomenon

For Paolo Fazioli, music isn’t just a profession – it’s a calling. In connection with the introduction of Fazioli's new model F198 and the presentation of The Cremona Musica Award 2024, we had the opportunity to get an exclusive interview with the famous instrument creator and award winner. Read more
 

Logo light pianostreet.com - the website for classical pianists, piano teachers, students and piano music enthusiasts.

Subscribe for unlimited access

Sign up

Follow us

Piano Street Digicert