I hate them all. Don't ever post up such a trivial question.
calm done it's just a question .
That is a very difficault question. IMO they are all amazing. If I had to choose one, I'd pick op.26.This was also Chopins favorite Beethoven Sonata. It sounds a bit like Chopin I think too.
Chopin was inspired by Op.27 No.2 for his Fantasie Impromptu, and Op.111 for his second Sonata and Op.10 No.12 Etude.
I'm not sure why you associate Op. 111 with the Chopin second sonata. The similarities between Op. 26 and the Chopin B-flat minor are much stronger -- the structure overall, the third movement funeral marches, and the fourth movement perpetual motion. Where are you getting this information?
Sonata's are all boring especially Beethovens. They are too long and boring and never hold the listner long enough to take them anywhere. I dont know why any composer would be bothered labouring over such long music, then again he was paid for it (unlike most composers who write for nothing). I feel sorry for the poor publishers who had to make sense of Beethovens scribble handwriting. Come to think of it I bet half of what we hear was written by the Publisher because he couldnt make out the blobs of ink and weather notes were sitting on the lines or the spaces etc etc. Take a look at the original manuscripts in those times they are unreadable.
In my top 5( and 3 of 5 are colab- its odd no one else made any mention of any of the incredible sonatas for piano and cello or piano and violin esp since ppsked question for sonata which I applaud as limiting to only solo piano sonatas is boring )No 9 kreutzerFreakin love this thing!
one more thing; in the first edition of the 106, theres a metronome mark for all four movements that i think was added by beethoven. however beethoven was deaf at that time, so how the hell does beethoven put metronome marks when he can't hear a metronome? no wonder they weren't very accuarte
Well, in those days... metronomes swung... Jk you knew that probably.It's just like following a conductor; you don't need him to make a sound to feel his beatEDIT: Seems like you were joking
one more thing; in the first edition of the 106, theres a metronome mark for all four movements that i think was added by beethoven. however beethoven was deaf at that time, so how the hell does beethoven put metronome marks when he can't hear a metronome?
Should the sonata not be suitable for London, I could send another one; or you could omit the Largo and begin straight away with the Fugue...which is the last movement; or you could use the first movement and then the Adagio, and then for the third movement the Scherzo--and omit entirely no. 4 with the Largo and Allegro risoluto. Or you could take just the first movement and the Scherzo and let them form the whole sonata. I leave it to you to do as you think best.
You can see a metronome too, right? He did still have his vision. The formatting of the metronome marks depends on your edition of the sonatas of course, but the metronome markings were an addition to the work after its initial composition. The first edition was by Artaria, but the metronome markings were sent by Beethoven to a different publisher in London after its initial publication by Artaria. This was a difficult time for Beethoven financially, which is why he sought its publication in England as well. In fact, in its English iteration the sonata even appeared as Op. 88 in two parts -- the introduction and fugue listed as separate entities. We think of Beethoven often as this kind of perfect god of composition from whose wishes we cannot deviate, but he actually wrote in his letters that the Op. 106 could be tinkered with. from Beethoven's letters: Remarkable, really!
Sonata's are all boring especially Beethovens.