The definition of an "amateur" from professionals has always been a controversial one. In the past, there were former professionals who gave up a professional career for a non-performance career, and many competitors had a performance degree or two, with an aspiration for a concertizing career.
However, far from everyone had an advanced performance degree from a conservatory, and many with advanced performance degrees didn't advance far. In the last two iteration of the Cliburn Amateur (formerly IPCOA) the level was all over the place.
But, the competition has helped relaunch a music teaching career for some past participants, and even a modest performance career for some. If the competition helped reignite passion for music, or even relaunch a career, all is good. But no one will go on building an international, full-time career from winning an amateur competition.
I felt a sense of camaraderie among us. From every iteration emerge several new couples, and I met my partner there in 2011, as well. If the competition reignited passion not only for music, but for love, what's not to like?
No professional pianist would gain any prestige by participating in this competition. It helped some competitors to return to music, or enhance their avocational music career.
This is my third time to participate . I was not expecting to advance as far as I did in the past years, and I was seriously ill-prepared in 2011. I am taking a more deliberate approach in my preparation, with a far more conservative (but not quite mainstream) repertoire that is well within my abilities and comfort zone.