Ha, it's such a loveable work. Of all the "not so serious" pieces of "serious" music it must be close to my favourite. Works quite well for wind+piano, actually. You have a few issues with arpeggios technique and chordal execution in places, but it's one of these pieces which8 is hard to go wrong with. It's so impactful. Thanks for this, brightened up my evening. I think I should post my Geehl version now
I know where you won't say that.
I can only say "Wow!"
Hi visitor,You deserve a lot of credit for coming up with the idea, seeing it through, and bringing it all to the performance. And, it sounds great!!! To you, albeit it a few years late, BRAVO!When you mentioned the arpeggios, my sense is that they probably had some difficulties with them, but then it was suggested that you use new fingerings. I think relatively few pianists could make a quick and successful change like that, and the performance date must have made it all the more iffy, with limited time to practice those to the point of making them convincing. And causing more nervousness!Percy Grainger -- I had to smile. He was a fine musician in his time. Altering other composers' scores was one of his activities. That is, editing. So you had that uncertainty as well -- yet another variable! One time Percy Grainger visited Grieg. Under Grainger's arm was Grieg's Piano Concerto in A. He played all his suggestions to Grieg. Schirmer actually printed a Grieg/Grainger edition of that concerto. Just about everyone loves the Warsaw Concerto. There is a solo piano score too, but the one with orchestra is more exciting. You and your orchestral friends all produced a fine rendition that day. It's a wonderful event you'll never forget. Congratulations again.David