Well, I quite agree, in abstract. Trying to impress audience, or other variants of the same behavior, is maybe an important part of the stage fright complex problem. But being much of the fear in a great part an automatic/inconscious/subconscious reaction, only trying consciously to let go the desire to impress (or the desire to not fail the expectations of the audience, the desire to achieve status, etc, etc) is not going to work in many cases. It may help but is not enough.
The most important thing, in my humble opinion, to cope with stage fright (I agree with you, pianoplayerstar) is becoming from amateur to professional, in the sense of giving as much recitals as you can. The gradual and controlled exposition to the fearful concert conditions is key. The more concerts/recitals you give, the less stage fright you'll have. You can, of course, do other therapies (affirmations, Gestalt, psychoanalysis...) but for me exposition to the source of fear is the most important one. If you accustom your brain, soul and body to the concert conditions and if your complete self learns that the concert environment is not a potentially harmful one, one day you will play maybe with nerves (sometimes even healthy for the performance) instead of that ruining panic.
Byron Janis gave 40 concerts before his Carnegie Hall debut. Lang Lang gave 80. We just can't count how many gave Richter before... Letting go ego desires, yes. Exposition to concert conditions to get accustomed to, yes too.
pianist1976, i had NO Idea.
Lang Lang had about 80 concerts BEFORE Carnegie?! Wow.
well, that says it: gotta practice the art of Stage Fright before you can conquer the 2nd step of performing: NERVES.
A simple solution is: BE IN THE MOMENT.
This is a performance tip for any pianist, actor, or for anything. When you're in-the-moment, in a crude sense, you really don't care or think about what others are thinking or doing.... you only think about yourself.
I kind of equate it to a great performer and a good performer.
.... a Great actor and a Very Good Actor... there's a difference.
Leonardo DiCaprio.
What is he? Great? or Very Good?
ANSWER: He is a VERY VERY VERY (and might I add "VERY".. again) Good Actor.... and I'll add it again... a very "Good" and I'll also add "Excellent" Actor.
HOWEVER, HOWEVER, in my my arrogant (or humble?) opinion, he is not "Great" in the sense of the Actor's World.
Robert DeNiro is a Great Actor... Great in the sense that he acts in-the-moment.
It's called METHOD ACTING. Al Pacino has it too.
When you watch them, you can see it deep in their eyes.
Leonardo DiCaprio is being himself. When you watch him act, you know it's "Leo DiCaprio" (I think.)
When you watch DeNiro or Al Pacino, they are THE actual characters. They're so focused, so -IN-THE-MOMENT- if you will, that literally, it's more than just INTENSE ACTING.
INTENSE ACTING is different than OVERACTING, which is what I see DiCaprio doing sometimes.
Remember, DiCap is not a junk actor (see above)... he's a very very good actor.. and excellent actor.
But he is NOT DeNiro or Pacino.
This is the same with pianists.... you can see if someone is really in-the-moment or not.
Being in the moment doesn't mean ........
................... the pianist is performing while closing his or her eyes, contorting her his face SW or NW or North or East, or sweating profusely, or smiling in lost amusement (like you can see in Danil Trifinov), or shaking hair follicles where you can literally see white pieces of dandruff splashing left and right and on the keys, or even ending a pieces with such vigor like ....Perahia ....
..............(although Perahia, I HAVE to admit is a man who plays in-the-moment... it's like drinking a bold cup of dark coffee in the morning when you listen to Perahia, so I have to give it to him as to his so-called "ending vigor" as he ends a Beethoven Sonata)..........
but most importantly, being in the moment means to be 'lost' in the moment, such that the audience literally knows what you're thinking almost and the audience is lost too.
I once heard Sarah Chang (violinist) once say that she wants to play so that she can take the audience into a different timeframe [then she's done her job].... or something to this effect.
So how do you recognize a PERFORMER whether they're IN-THE-MOMENT or not?
ANSWER? You gotta watch 'em. You'll know it when you see it.