Hi Pat. Thanks for the advice. But this is just standard thumb under advice right? I've been told this before and you're right, I probably just need to practice it a "million" times to get the thumb to respond timely.But I'm more interested in thumb over technique, (which from what I can tell, is a very inaccurate description), where the awkward thumb under is forsaken especially in faster runs.
I think you are absolutely right. You should go with thumb-over. There is no other way for faster passages anyway. There are many pianists who have never even heard of the thumb-under technique
The main point is lack of preparation. Actually, when you are playing the E, you have to make your thumb stand-by on the next note. In other words, when you play the E, the thumb position should already been on F.
i don't think it's possible to play "anything" using thumb-over, but rather choose between thumb-under and thumb-over on a per-case base.for instance: i think thumb-over is the best technique for fast accurate arppegios, but i prefer thumb-under for scales (that's the way i play).
I don't understand what 'thumb over' means. Would someone please explain to a simple creature? Thanks.