Our affinity or otherwise with a person's artistic (or scientific for that matter) achievements have nothing whatever to do with the creator as a human being. [...]It has a serious side in the thoroughly mistaken assumption that creativity, imagination and freedom of thought in art necessarily imply the abandonment of health and common sense in life. This entirely false notion has hurt a lot of talented people in the past and continues to do so today.
It has a serious side in the thoroughly mistaken assumption that creativity, imagination and freedom of thought in art necessarily imply the abandonment of health and common sense in life. This entirely false notion has hurt a lot of talented people in the past and continues to do so today.
...I'm pretty happy with the way my life is now.
We might just notice the stupidity of very talented people more than we notice the stupidity of a likely equal proportion of less talented people. I do not see why that state is incompatible with exceptional talent. The question has arisen several times in the fifteen years I have been on music forums. Some people assert that the creative impulse is best served by discontent and about the same number assert it is nurtured by comfortable stasis; a wretched Socrates or a happy pig ? In terms of artistic product perhaps it doesn't matter which we are.
Clara did NOT have an affair with Brahms. I get the point you want to make but leave my Clara alone!