Boy that is a lot of pieces you are working on at the same time. Your teacher is allowing you to add another? Definitely enough for a senior recital or even for a Masters recital perhaps.
Out of the one's you listed I think Debussy's Reflets dans l'eau is a good choice. Imo more approachable than Jeux d'eau.
If you have never played Scriabin before, don't play a sonata or any late works. I made the miatake of starting with op 74, and I can't say it was the greatest decision I have made.
I disagree. If the OP likes impressionist music they probably have the right mindset for late Scriabin. Vers la Flamme is pretty learnable . . . I can't say it's easy, though.Though if OP is playing the Apres un lecture and the Prokofiev Toccata, surely their own teacher would have better advice than we could.For Debussy, you want to know what would go over really well, and be pretty easy? Feuilles Mortes + General Lavine - Eccentric. Those are both easy to make 'sound like Debussy' and are good music.
If you think Vers la Flamme is 'learnable' then I definetely do not think you understand what late Scriabin is all about. It is so much more than tremolos and weird rhytms. Once you have learned the notes you aren't even near done. In fact you have just started. You need to have a lot of imagination for late Scriabin, because most late Scriabin pieces (especially sonatas) are very weird, both the harmonic language and the rhytms. You can't play these pieces without the proper understanding, no matter how perfectly you play it technically. That is why i don't think OP should touch late Scriabin without having more experience with his early pieces, because the early pieces are great pieces because they are basically the same style as the late pieces, they are just not as developed.Also, Scriabin isn't impressionistic in the same sense as Debussy or ravel. Scriabins music is much more philosophic while the french impressionists are much more about colour. You can't compare them to each other. With that said, I think OP should look at Scriabins poems, they are all awesome, and some are pretty easy.
Though if OP is playing the Apres un lecture and the Prokofiev Toccata, surely their own teacher would have better advice than we could.
Myth of linearity: that you need to play a composer's body of work in a "progressive order" to understand a single mature work. You don't. Also stop projecting your failures on others. La danse de Puck is not a major work, but it's really fun to play.
Gaspard is pretty easy why don't you give it a shot
Sarcasm, I think ...?Well I DID spend an hour last night working on the thirds etude and it didn't seem near as hard as its reputation suggests ... Maybe that's just 'cause I haven't gotten into the meat of trying to get it up to tempo, but it actually seems pretty straightforward, and it actually fits my hand really well. How hintoresting.
lol yeah I was kiddingBut I do think the OP should give it a shot. I don't think difficulty should deter anyone from trying anything Additionally the gaspard is harder than it looks. And it already looks almost impossible anyways lol