Home
Piano Music
Piano Music Library
Top composers »
Bach
Beethoven
Brahms
Chopin
Debussy
Grieg
Haydn
Mendelssohn
Mozart
Liszt
Prokofiev
Rachmaninoff
Ravel
Schubert
Schumann
Scriabin
All composers »
All composers
All pieces
Search pieces
Recommended Pieces
Audiovisual Study Tool
Instructive Editions
Recordings
PS Editions
Recent additions
Free piano sheet music
News & Articles
PS Magazine
News flash
New albums
Livestreams
Article index
Piano Forum
Resources
Music dictionary
E-books
Manuscripts
Links
Mobile
About
About PS
Help & FAQ
Contact
Forum rules
Pricing
Log in
Sign up
Piano Forum
Home
Help
Search
Piano Forum
»
Piano Board
»
Repertoire
»
How do y’all “study” recordings?
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Topic: How do y’all “study” recordings?
(Read 1411 times)
abr314
PS Silver Member
Newbie
Posts: 7
How do y’all “study” recordings?
on: May 25, 2018, 02:11:29 PM
Say you’ve decided to do a deep dive on the interpretations of a single performer. What procedure do you use to learn a significant amount about her interpretive choices? Is it simply repeated listening, or do you approach it more like a “judge” and actively make markings in a score while listening?
Logged
visitor
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 5294
Re: How do y’all “study” recordings?
Reply #1 on: May 25, 2018, 02:17:46 PM
you need to listen to a bunch of of recordings by different artists of the said piece to get an idea of what is traditional and customary or consensus on basic interpretation then you compare said artist against that standard
Logged
https://tinyurl.com/danbo-de-piano-part-deux
https://twitter.com/DeDanbo?s=09
afarmboysforte
Jr. Member
Posts: 29
Re: How do y’all “study” recordings?
Reply #2 on: May 25, 2018, 09:03:55 PM
I agree with visitor. I can judge a piece without knowing it well, but I enjoy the process much more when I am familiar with what it sounds like, and know the "standard" for everything. From there, when I deeply analyze a particular artist's interpretation, I sit with a score in front of me (usually digital) and make marks just like an adjudicator might. Then I ask myself questions much like the "rubrics" that judges sometime use. Technical stability, rhythm, intonation if applicable, and respect for the composer's intention are all the easiest factors. Then I ask myself, how much of what the performer is wanting to do coming through to the audience? Even with interpretations I don't like, a great artist is able to convey what they want. Oftentimes, I feel like I only succeed at 30-50 % of the musical and technical messages I wish to communicate at best, which is why I'm not a good artist. Take Richter for example. Not everyone's favorite, but in some of his recordings, I can see that he is nearly 100% successful at doing what he would like with the piece (not always.. richter is sometimes hit and miss, but I was just using him as an example.) And finally, how does it compare to what the composer wanted, and what do I think about it?
Hopefully my cluttered thoughts make sense
Logged
abr314
PS Silver Member
Newbie
Posts: 7
Re: How do y’all “study” recordings?
Reply #3 on: May 26, 2018, 05:57:58 PM
That made a lot of sense and was quite helpful. Thank you!
Logged
Bob
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 16364
Re: How do y’all “study” recordings?
Reply #4 on: May 28, 2018, 02:34:15 AM
I've found it interesting to use Audacity software to "play" with a recording a bit. Slow it down. Split it up, phrase by phrase. Especially for comparing two performers, it seemed to help.
It probably takes less brain power/attention in doing that. With multiple listenings there's more to absorb.
Logged
Favorite new teacher quote -- "You found the only possible wrong answer."
Sign-up to post reply
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
For more information about this topic, click search below!
Search on Piano Street