Home
Piano Music
Piano Music Library
Top composers »
Bach
Beethoven
Brahms
Chopin
Debussy
Grieg
Haydn
Mendelssohn
Mozart
Liszt
Prokofiev
Rachmaninoff
Ravel
Schubert
Schumann
Scriabin
All composers »
All composers
All pieces
Search pieces
Recommended Pieces
Audiovisual Study Tool
Instructive Editions
Recordings
PS Editions
Recent additions
Free piano sheet music
News & Articles
PS Magazine
News flash
New albums
Livestreams
Article index
Piano Forum
Resources
Music dictionary
E-books
Manuscripts
Links
Mobile
About
About PS
Help & FAQ
Contact
Forum rules
Pricing
Log in
Sign up
Piano Forum
Home
Help
Search
Piano Forum
»
Piano Board
»
Audition Room
»
Scriabin 2 Preludes Op. 27
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Topic: Scriabin 2 Preludes Op. 27
(Read 1388 times)
lowk-_-y
PS Silver Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 43
Scriabin 2 Preludes Op. 27
on: August 16, 2020, 01:21:44 AM
Here's my playing of Scriabin's 2 Preludes, Op.27. Quite a contrast in mood but equal in beauty.
Feel free to share your thoughts.
Also, the weird hesitation at end of the second prelude is due to the note refusing to sound at first
Logged
Scriabin: Prelude Op. 27 No. 1 in G Minor
Sign up for a Piano Street membership to download this piano score.
Sign up for FREE! >>
Scriabin: Prelude Op. 27 No. 2 in B Major
Sign up for a Piano Street membership to download this piano score.
Sign up for FREE! >>
medtnerfan
PS Silver Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 68
Re: Scriabin 2 Preludes Op. 27
Reply #1 on: August 24, 2020, 08:27:12 PM
Thanks for sharing, I love these 2 preludes.
This is for the first one, I'll write up feedback for the 2nd one later.
I listened to Sofronitsky's recording as well and it seems like he's interpreting the portamentos in the first 6 measures as instructions for rubato; basically he's delaying them and then playing them faster. I recommend checking that out for inspiration for rubato.
For the end of the phrase at measure 8, right before the piano dynamic, you don't play the F and D in the right hand at the same time. I'm not sure if this was intentional or a misreading. In the score I'm looking at the D is positioned slightly to the right, but it's meant to be on the third beat (7th eighth note pulse)
For measures 9-12, where have piano, try to experiment with using the una corda pedal there but without playing too soft (in other words voice the top by quite a bit, as well as the counter melody), then for 13 onwards, release the una corda but start the cresc softer. This is just a suggestion to try out.
For the fortissimo section, I think it should be stronger (specifically the F in the second beat), this could be because of the piano you're working with or the recording equipment. Here are some tips that might help, first the chord (right hand) can be awkward to play, making it harder to control the dynamics, but you can take the first G in the mid voice with the thumb for more control. To be clear, I'm talking about the second measure from the "allarg", second beat (4th eighth note pulse), where the left is playing Bb-D-G-Bb and the right hand is playing F-G-Bb-F. Another thing, take that chord on it's own and try to achieve different dynamic levels while still maintaining good tone quality.
For the forte section at the end, before the mesto, you take a slower tempo (the same as the mesto section). I personally think you should keep a little bit of the energy that preceded this section, maybe use rubato (accelerating a little bit in the middle of the section maybe). The reason for this is that you don't want to take away from the mesto section.
For the mesto section, I would play the eighth notes almost straight. I think that would give a sense of "giving up", like in the previous sections there was an impassioned yearning for something, but now maybe you're considering giving up. Also, experimenting with una corda here wouldn't be a bad idea I don't think.
Last thing is phrasing, especially in the end, some notes seem to get unintentionally accented (only a slight accent, but it still disrupts the phrase). Try practicing those sections all pianissimo as an exercise for more control over the phrasing. I sent you this video before, but I'll link it again, I always practice this to achieve more control when I'm not happy with my phrasing because of lack of control. Link here:
Logged
lowk-_-y
PS Silver Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 43
Re: Scriabin 2 Preludes Op. 27
Reply #2 on: August 28, 2020, 06:14:59 PM
Thank you for your feedback, insightful as always.
Yes, I do love sofronitsky, my go-to for scriabin. He has such a stylised sense of rubato, I doubt I could even try to imitate it while keeping the sense of direction that I intended. Although, now in hindsight, do you think my tempo is a bit fast for the patetico marking. I've heard some unbelievably slow recordings of this.
The B8 misplacement was just a misread on my part, thanks for pointing that out.
For the fortissimo section, I think overall you're right, it is quite difficult to give this huge passionate feeling while having a quality, controlled sound. I think this section sounds a bit harsh and the melodic line was a little obscured by the repeated chords.
Good point about the tempo before the mesto, slowing down here definitely takes away from the impact of the mesto but I'm not sure how I'd justify maintaining the energy here. I was picturing that after the huge climax in the middle, anything after should be more of a resignation. Perhaps there would be another way to get this feel other than slowing down.
I like your idea about the mesto section with straight quavers without rubato.
You're also right about the phrasing, a lot for me to work on.
It wouldn't be a response from you without a Josh Wright video
but yes I think his ideas would be useful here.
Thank you for your thoughts.
Logged
Sign-up to post reply
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up