Could you elaborate on what you were trying to say?
The video itself lists each performer, work, and composer, and you can even find the dates of all the works in the comments below.
Oleg Marshev thought it the most difficult and he has performed all the Medtner and Rachmaninoff. It's the Zichy left hand that's borderline impossible.
Yeah, some of these like the Grieg, Arensky - or especially the Ustvolskaya, which is borderline elementary - feel like "I couldn't think of 100 concerti."
Like my previous ranking video, this is less of a truly accurate list of difficulty but rather a compilation of interesting bits and pieces from great concertos throughout history. Because there’s a lot of endless note spinning in these concertos (big surprise), I tried to mix in as many lyrical sections as I could so that the entire video wouldn’t just be one big cadenza. As far as a general idea of difficulty: The concerti ranked 100-75 are really not tremendously difficult and can be learned by early advanced students. 79-55 contain the bulk of the standard repertory as well as many other lesser known works. 54-30 contain the harder concerti that are played by virtuosos, 29-11 comprise the most difficult works in the standard repertoire, and then the works in the top 10 are truly monstrous works that require a lifetime dedication to master. Although I have to point out that the Ginastera Concerto No.1 is definitely not the most difficult concerto out there (that title goes to either a Xenakis or Sorabji work), and perhaps not even more difficult than some of the others in the top 10. I just wanted to end the video on that amazing ending.Honorable mentions: These include pieces that would be on the list if I could find a proper recording or sheet music—for some I have neither. Or they might be pieces that didn’t make it on the list for sake of variety. If you want a solid answer to which are truly the most difficult piano concerti, it’ll likely be the top five on this honorable mentions list. Xenakis Synaphai Sorabji Symphonic Variations for Piano and OrchestraXenakis Palimpsest Sorabji Concerti Denisov ConcertoCarter ConcertoRzewski ConcertoBabbitt Concerto A. Feinberg ConcertoPenderecki ConcertoTveitt ConcertosFurtwangler ConcertoOrnstein ConcertoLiebermann ConcertiYoshimatsu Piano ConcertoRozycki ConcertiBronsart ConcertoDvořák Concerto Perle ConcertosBalakirev ConcertiSchytte ConcertoShchedrin ConcertiRies ConcertiKalkbrenner ConcertiEmerson ConcertoMoscheles ConcertiRontgen Concerto
So no. On the contrary to "I couldn't think of 100 concerti", I had far more concerti than I could fit and if you don't like my specific choices, then that's okay. Sorry that this video wasn't tailored to pretentious know-it-alls who turn up their noses at popular repertoire and MUST have such and such on a compilation in order to be able to sleep at night.
You couldn't find 100 difficult concerti, not unrelated to the fact that you don't know hardly anything about 20th/21st century music.
But you decided to make a youtube video that combines - via excruciating labor, making the project all the more cringeworthy - the most infantile aspects of pianostreet thought and da SDC thought, rolled into one, then came on here to shill it like a teenage girl on Instagram. This whole endeavor reeks on the one hand of the most facile sort of interest of the most tedious sort of PS newbie, while on the other glorifying (more precisely, ostensibly glorifying) the cataloguing of technical feats with a sort of Asperger flair more SDC-appropriate. It's the effort of an immature listener, inherently and obviously.
But the bottom line: It's a bit queer that you think a video titled "100 most difficult piano concerti" should be above the reproach of critiques pointing out that it's littered with easy pieces, because you were up front in how miserably you failed the project. That you preemptively let us know that you failed does not turn it into a success.
It seems that you possess the distinctly unlikeable quality of being constantly impulsed to let others know that you are more educated and cultured than anybody else.
It's a piano forum ghost town that you came to looking for validation, so . . . weird slight.
As opposed to the piano forum ghost town you usually hang out on, da SDC:
but way more racists
Anyway, who is David Rakowski? Pretends to know what's up in the 21st Century piano scene, check.
Radulescu's piano music isn't that great, and is technically elementary. Anyone could play it. Feigns familiarity with obscure composers, check. Thus:
It seems that you're the one with this quality - just without the actual knowledge
You posted your 100 special, most favorite-est concerti
There is also no lost love for the so called "peoplemusik" and that awful Thalberg concerto.
To make that remark, you must know even less about Czerny than you do about piano concertos.
As for orchestration skill, the orchestra was a little more than an accompaniment for many piano concertos of that era. Moscheles, Kalkbrenner, Pixis, Herz, Dreyschock, Field and countless others. It has absolutely nothing to do with skill.Go do some homework.
...the orchestration on early romantic piano concertos do not suck. They were sufficient for their intended purpose.