However, if we were to suggest we are taking the E major chord from the E major key itself or the IV from the B major key would we able be able to temporarily change tonal center to the E or B keys respectfully?
My second question was to do with changing back to the D major key if we only want to use the borrowed chord for a very short period of time. But I guess this could be just done by using any of the D major diatonic cords and reverting the melody back to the D scale. I know you will say A major 7 would be a good chord choice for a smoother transition? (using a comon chord between both keys as a bridge)
It's not really necessary to shift tonal centre. You can just use a borrowed chord for a short period of time to create additional harmonic colour.Example:D, E, Bm, Em/G, A, DOr you could treat it modaly, where chords do not feel like they need to resolve to one another. D lydian:D, E, F#m, Bm, C#m, D
It's not really necessary to shift tonal centre. You can just use a borrowed chord for a short period of time to create additional harmonic colour.Example:D, E, Bm, Em/G, A, D
Hi quantum. I improvised with your progression and tried to stay in key of D major with the borrowed chord E and noticed every pitch in D major sounds good with the chord except for G. that is because the major 3rd in E major is a g# and it conflicts with this tone of the D major key. And D instead of D# in the melody will only sound weird if you first use G#. Almost as if using a G# or d# instantly causes a modulation. What's your thoughts on this
If you have a borrowed chord you might need to change the melody slightly to fit the harmony. That is, unless you are trying to go for a modal mixture or polytonal feel to the music. You need to decide what is more important: a melody that is consistent with the home mode, a harmonic progression that takes priority (thus the need to modify the melody), polytonality where melody and harmony act independently, or somewhere in between these general approaches. Just because you are working with a specific tonal centre, say D major, does not mean you strictly have to make the melody conform to it. The melody can also temporarily diverge from the tonal centre, just like the harmony can. Certain scale degrees tend to be more reactive than others: the 3rd can determine the major or minor modality, and the 7th can be used as a leading tone. We are talking about conventional diatonic use of the scale. If we use the scale in other ways, these generalizations might not apply.As an exercise, you can improvise by starting at a home key. Then intentionally insert a wrong note or wrong chord, basically anything that would require an accidental. Musically apply this wrong note or chord and navigate your melody and harmony back to the home key. If you like the sound of this wrong note, you might even want to repeat it or use it as thematic material.
Also practice using harmony modaly, in a manner that avoids the specific gravitational resolutions encountered in diatonic harmony. It will give you a feel of how to make chord progressions avoiding strong resolutions. Examples of how to use this kind of harmonic progression can be found in the organ accompaniments to Gregorian Chant. An Example:Notice how the harmony just floats in the background without any strong resolutions. It allows the melody to be prominent.
Understood. Thank you for explaining this so well. I notice when I improvise and play and accidental, the flow of the music automatically pulls to a chord or melody tone that includes the accidental. Like if I play a melody against a C major chord and on the melody I chromatically move up from F to F# the music wants me to play a D Chord or F# f#(min) chord or something similar next.
I have tested using the d lydian scale (added g#) with the chords you posted above (D, E, F#m, Bm, C#m, D) and all harmonizes perfectly. I’m just trying to determine if you have used any particular formula that is avoided using G#dim (iv dim) and A (V) when using the d lydian mode. Did you avoid these chords because they want to resolve back to the tonic? I think yes just wanted to confirm
Thank you very much quantum. Everything you said makes perfect sense and I'm still improvising. Right now I'm marveling over a piece of Bach literature and was wondering if you would be able to help me solve a couple of things. I want to know what was going through his head while composing a piece like this. What is he doing from a theoretical and harmonic perspective?
I think you'll find the harmony easier to make sense of if you focus on the left hand. There are a lot of suspensions and passing tones in the RH that confuse things a bit.For example, I'd call the first beat of the second bar a g7 chord with a suspension in the RH which resolves from C to Bb. The last beat of that measure is a Bb major chord with some passing tones in the RH. The whole progression from the last beat of the first measure to the first beat of the fourth measure is what's called a circle of fifths progression it goes d7-g7-C7-Fmaj7-Bb-e7-a7-d7-g7-C7-F. You can just follow the bass line. All the chords in that circle of fifths progression are in root position.https://musictheory.pugetsound.edu/mt21c/CircleOfFifths.html
Can you give a clue as to the identity of the piece.