An extra thought about "cadence"
The first time I learned the term, it was introduced as a pair of chords, and they also happened to be at the end of a passage when presented. You had your I-V, I-V (imperfect), V-I (perfect), V-vi (deceptive), IV-I (plagal) and different schools will nuance the names but that's the gist. A "cadence" was a combo of those chords.
Later, in formal theory, there was an extension of the Tonic that might go I-V-I-V-I-V-I for a while, sometimes with an inversion thrown in. Clearly any "V-I" pair in there was not a cadence. So a specific chord-pair did not in and of itself make a "cadence".
The Goetschius book, then, gave a better definition of a cadence. Something like, that it marks the ending of something - whether of a passage, or the 'call' part of a phrase before the 'answer' part. The chords were part of the cadence. But so was time. The passage often slows down at a cadence. If there is a relentless rhythm, that might alter. My concept of "cadence" changed from that point forward to something that was more than just a specific pair of chords.
Interested in other thoughts.
Topic: cadences